Sovath v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 66

ORDER GRANTING 65 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Karen Sovath, General Electric Capital Retail Bank terminated; Terminating 42 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)(6) filed by General Electric Capital Retail Bank, Motions terminated: 42 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)(6) filed by General Electric Capital Retail Bank. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/22/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2016)

Case 5:15-cv-03849-EJD Document 65 Filed 01/20/16 Page 1 of 2

S

RT

E R DATED: 1/22/2016 C
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R

H

7

FO

. D av i l a

LI

NO

J

w a rd J
u d ge E d

R NIA

D
RDERE

OO
IT IS S

A

UNIT
ED

RT
U
O

1 Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)
Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)
2 Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)
SAGARIA LAW, P.C.
3 2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor
San Jose, California 95110
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN JOSE DIVISION

10
11
KAREN SOVATH,

Federal Case No.: 5:15-CV-03849-EJD

12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
15 INC.; et. al.,
16

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT GE
CAPITAL RETAIL BANK/SYNCHRONY
BANK PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)

Defendants.

17
18
19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Karen Sovath, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
20 Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant G.E. Capital Retail Bank, as to all
21 claims in this action.
22

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, in relevant part:

23

41(a) Voluntary Dismissal

24

(1) By the Plaintiff

25

(a) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(3), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any

26

applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court

27

order by filing:

28

(1) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer
1
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK

Case 5:15-cv-03849-EJD Document 65 Filed 01/20/16 Page 2 of 2

1
2

or a motion for summary judgment.
Defendant GE Capital Retail Bank, has neither answered Plaintiff’s Complaint, nor filed a

3 motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the matter may be dismissed against it, with
4 prejudice, for all purposes and without an Order of the Court.
5

This order also terminates Docket Item No. 42 and vacates all related deadlines and hearings.

6 Dated: January 20, 2016

Sagaria Law, P.C.

7
By:
8
9

/s/ Elliot W. Gale
Elliot W. Gale
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Karen Sovath

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK