Sovath v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 77

ORDER Granting 76 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (of Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, without prejudice)filed by Karen Sovath. Toyota Financial Services terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/20/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2016)

Case 5:15-cv-03849-EJD Document 76 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 2

S

H

ER

DATED: 4/20/2016

N

R NIA

av i l a

FO

a rd J . D

LI

RT

dw
J u d ge E

A

UNIT
ED

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

NO

7

RT
U
O

1 Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)
Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)
2 Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)
SAGARIA LAW, P.C.
3 2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor
San Jose, California 95110
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN JOSE DIVISION

10
11
KAREN SOVATH,

Federal Case No.: 5:15-CV-03849-EJD

12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
15 INC.; et. al.,
16

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)

Defendants.

17
18
19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Karen Sovath, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
20 Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation as
21 to all claims in this action.
22

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, in relevant part:

23

41(a) Voluntary Dismissal

24

(1) By the Plaintiff

25

(a) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(3), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any

26

applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court

27

order by filing:

28
1
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT
CORPORATION

Case 5:15-cv-03849-EJD Document 76 Filed 04/18/16 Page 2 of 2

1

(1) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer

2
3

or a motion for summary judgment.
Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation has neither answered Plaintiff’s Complaint,

4 nor filed a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the matter may be dismissed against it,
5 without prejudice, for all purposes and without an Order of the Court.
6
7 Dated: April 18, 2016

Sagaria Law, P.C.

8
By:
9
10

/s/ Elliot W. Gale
Elliot W. Gale
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Karen Sovath

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT
CORPORATION