Stoelting v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 30

ORDER GRANTING #27 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by WebBank. Response due 10/30/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/24/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2015)

S
Attorneys for Defendant
WEBBANK

ER

7

DATED:9/24/2015

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

R NIA

. D av i l a

FO

w a rd J
u d ge E d

LI

J

H

6

RT

5

NO

4

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

A

3

UNIT
ED

2

C. Brandon Wisoff (State Bar No. 121930)
[e-mail]
Alexander M. Porcaro (State Bar No. 281185)
[e-mail]
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12

LISA STOELTING,

13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.

Case No. 5:15-cv-03857-EJD
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANT WEBBANK’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-1)

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC., et al.,

16
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

Plaintiff Lisa Stoelting and Defendant WebBank, by and through their respective counsel,
hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, on June 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed her Complaint in this action in the Superior
Court of the State of California for the County of Santa Clara;
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2015, Defendant TransUnion, LLC filed a notice to remove
this action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 et seq;
WHEREAS, on September 3, 2015, Plaintiff served WebBank with a copy of her
Complaint;
WHEREAS, WebBank currently must file and serve a response to the Complaint on or
before September 24, 2015, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(c)(2);
STIP. TO EXTEND WEBBANK’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 5:15-cv-03857-EJD

32282\5056591.1

1
2
3

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and WebBank have not yet filed any stipulation in this Court as to
WebBank’s time to file and serve a response to the Complaint;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and WebBank have agreed, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), to

4

extend the time for WebBank to respond to the Complaint to and including October 30, 2015;

5

WHEREAS, this extension of time will not alter the date of any event or any deadline

6

already fixed by Court order;

7

NOW, THEREFORE, PLAINTIFF AND WEBBANK HEREBY AGREE AND

8

STIPULATE THAT WebBank shall have to and including October 30, 2015, to respond to the

9

Complaint.

10
11

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: September 23, 2015

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

12
By:

13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff
LISA STOELTING

15
16

/s/ Elliot W. Gale
Elliot W. Gale

Dated: September 23, 2015

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

17
By:

18
19

/s/ Alexander M. Porcaro
Alexander M. Porcaro
Attorneys for Defendant
WEBBANK

20

FILER’S ATTESTATION

21
22

In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby attest that all signatories have concurred in

23

the filing of this document.

24
25

Dated: September 23, 2015
/s/ Alexander M. Porcaro
Alexander M. Porcaro

26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

STIP. TO EXTEND WEBBANK’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 5:15-cv-03857-EJD

-2-