Anderson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 44

ORDER GRANTING 43 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond filed by Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. Response due 1/21/2016. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/8/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2016)

Download PDF
R NIA FO RT H LI NO A S UNIT ED RT U O 1 MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622) mdl@severson.com 2 REBECCA S. SAELAO (State Bar No. 222731) rss@severson.com S DISTRICT TE 3 SEVERSON & WERSON C TA A Professional Corporation 4 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 DERED 5 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 SO OR Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 IT IS 6 SCOTT J. HYMAN (State Bar No. 148709) 7 sjh@severson.com av i l a a rd J . D COURTNEY C. WENRICK (State Bar No. 286380) ge E d w Jud 8 ccw@severson.com SEVERSON & WERSON E R DATED: 1/8/2016 C 9 A Professional Corporation N F The Atrium D IS T IC T O 10 19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700 R Irvine, California 92612 11 Telephone: (949) 442-7110 Facsimile: (949) 442-7118 12 Attorneys for Defendant 13 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (erroneously sued as Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.) 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 TIM ANDERSON, Case No. 5:15-cv-03858-EJD 17 Hon. Edward J. Davila Plaintiff, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor 18 vs. 19 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 20 INC.; EQUIFAX, INC.; TRANSUNION, RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT LLC; ADVANTA BANK CORP.; (LR 7-12) 21 AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY; ONPOINT COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION; 22 WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC. and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive, Action Filed: June 19, 2015 23 Removal Date: August 24, 2015 Defendants. Trial Date: None Set 24 25 26 27 28 07685.0000/6232228.1 Case No. 5:15-cv-03858-EJD Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint (LR 7-12) 1 Plaintiff TIM ANDERSON (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 2 (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate as follows: 3 WHEREAS, on or about June 19, 2015, Plaintiff filed a complaint and a summons was 4 issued in the above-referenced case; 5 WHEREAS, the above-referenced case was removed to federal court on August 24, 2015; 6 WHEREAS, the summons and complaint were served on Defendant on December 17, 7 2015; 8 WHEREAS, pursuant to the summons, the deadline within which to file a responsive 9 pleading is January 7 2016; and 10 WHEREAS, Defendant, through counsel, has requested a two-week extension of time 11 within which to respond to the complaint and Plaintiff, through counsel, has agreed to this request. 12 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate as follows: 13 1. The time for Defendant to respond to the complaint shall be extended by two weeks 14 up to and including January 21, 2016. 15 2. This is the first extension of time to respond for Defendant. 16 3. This extension will not affect any other deadlines in this case. 17 4. This stipulation is without prejudice to the rights, claims, arguments and defenses 18 of all parties. 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 07685.0000/6232228.1 Case No. 5:15-cv-03858-EJD 1 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint (LR 7-12) 1 All other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the 2 filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 3 4 DATED: January 7, 2016 SAGARIA LAW, P.C. 5 6 By: 7 8 /s/ Elliot W. Gale Elliot W. Gale Attorneys for Plaintiff TIM ANDERSON 9 10 11 DATED: January 7, 2016 12 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 13 14 By: 15 16 /s/ Courtney C. Wenrick Courtney C. Wenrick Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (erroneously sued as Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 07685.0000/6232228.1 Case No. 5:15-cv-03858-EJD 2 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint (LR 7-12)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?