Pepper, N.A. v. Expandi, Inc. et al
Filing
53
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Pepper must submit a declaration that authenticates exhibits B, D, H, I, J, L, and M, in Dkt. No. 51 , by 5:00 PM on 4/25/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 4/21/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
PEPPER, N.A.,
Plaintiff,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
Case No. 15-cv-04066 NC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
EXPANDI, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
The parties have a pending summary judgment motion with the Court. In
17
defendants’ reply brief, defendants objected to most of Pepper’s exhibits because the
18
exhibits are not authenticated. Dkt. No. 51. At the hearing, the Court gave Pepper an
19
opportunity to reply, and Pepper stated that some of the documents had been produced by
20
defendants, and that authentication was not necessary at this stage. Upon further review,
21
the Court observes that Pepper did not attach a declaration attesting to the authenticity of
22
the documents in its opposition to defendants’ summary judgment motion.
23
“We have repeatedly held that unauthenticated documents cannot be considered in a
24
motion for summary judgment. In a summary judgment motion, documents authenticated
25
through personal knowledge must be attached to an affidavit that meets the requirements
26
of Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e) and the affiant must be a person through whom the exhibits could
27
be admitted into evidence.” Orr v. Bank of Am., NT & SA, 285 F.3d 764, 773-74 (9th Cir.
28
2002) (internal quotations and citations omitted).
Case No. 15-cv-04066 NC
1
Thus, Pepper is ordered to show cause why the Court should not exclude exhibits B,
2
D, H, I, J, L, and M because Pepper failed to present admissible evidence. Pepper must
3
submit a declaration that authenticates the documents, along with the supporting evidence
4
by 5:00 p.m. on April 25, 2016, or the Court will exclude those exhibits.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: April 21, 2016
9
_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 15-cv-04066 NC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?