Pepper, N.A. v. Expandi, Inc. et al

Filing 87

ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING RE: UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES CLAIM. Plaintiff must state with particularity its theories of liability under the California Unfair Business Practices Act, and also state when and how Pepper disclosed each theory to defendants by Friday, May 13 at 4:00 p.m.. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/12/16. (nclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PEPPER, N.A., Plaintiff, United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 v. EXPANDI, INC., et al., Case No.15-cv-04066-NC ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING RE: UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES CLAIM Defendants. 15 16 Pepper’s complaint states a claim under the California Unfair Business Practices 17 Act, which prohibits the use of any “unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business act or 18 practice.” Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200. In its motion for summary judgment and 19 proposed jury instructions, Pepper lists a number of statutes or theories of defendants’ 20 unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business acts. At summary judgment, the Court did not 21 address those theories, finding that Pepper’s claim under § 17200 could continue, as 22 attached to the other claims in the case. Dkt. No. 55. 23 Defendants object to most of the jury instructions, stating that Pepper did not 24 disclose these theories in its complaint. Dkt. No. 77. The Court agrees with defendants 25 that Pepper’s complaint states a theory of liability under § 17200 limited to the other 26 claims in the case. 27 28 Thus, the Court orders Pepper to state with particularity its theories of liability under the California Unfair Business Practices Act, and also state when and how Pepper Case No.15-cv-04066-NC 1 disclosed each theory to defendants. Pepper must submit the additional briefing by Friday, 2 May 13 at 4:00 p.m. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: May 12, 2016 6 _____________________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.:15-cv-04066-NC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?