Richard Pohly v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Filing 23

ORDER extending deadline for Plaintiff Pohly to respond to Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc.'s Administrative Motion to consider whether cases should be related (Case:15cv00300RMW). Response due 12/15/2015. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/23/2015. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Richard H. Friedman (CA Bar No. 221622)
[e-mail]
Peter J. Mullenix (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Friedman | Rubin
51 University Street, Suite 201
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
John Graham Hill (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
2323 S. Shepherd Drive, 14th Floor
Houston TX 77019
Tel: [phone]

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

GERALD DARRINGER and CAROL
DARRINGER,

14

Plaintiffs,
v.

15
16

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.,

17

Defendant.

No. 5:15-cv-00300 RMW
[PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
PLAINTIFF POHLY TO RESPOND TO
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD
BE RELATED

18
19
20

RICHARD POHLY,

No. 5:15-cv-04113 PSG
Plaintiff,

v.

21
22
23

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., a Delaware
corporation headquartered in California,
Defendant.

[PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
PLAINTIFF POHLY TO RESPOND TO
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD
BE RELATED

24
25
26

THE COURT, having considered the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Extend Deadline for

27

Plaintiff Pohly to Respond to Intuitive Surgical, Inc.’s Administration Motion to Consider

28

Whether Cases Should Be Related, rules as follows:

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
Page 1
No. 5:15-cv-00300 RMW

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiff Pohly to Respond to Intuitive

2

Surgical, Inc.’s Administration Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related is extended

3

to December 11, 2015.

4

23
DONE IN OPEN COURT this ____ day of November, 2015.

5
6
7

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Court Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
Page 2
No. 5:15-cv-00300 RMW