Ingram v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER GRANTING 27 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Ally Financial, Inc. Ally Financial, Inc. Response due 12/15/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/27/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2015)

Download PDF
R NIA J . D av i l a H E R DATED: 10/27/2015 C N F D IS T IC T O R A RT d w a rd J u d ge E FO I LI S UNIT ED RT U O ERED ORD T IS SO NO 1 JOHN B. SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 96742) jbs@severson.com 2 MARY KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203) mks@severson.com 3 ALISA A. GIVENTAL (State Bar No. 273551) aag@severson.com 4 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 5 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 6 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 ALLY FINANCIAL, INC. S DISTRICT TE C TA 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA— SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 MARY ANN INGRAM, Case No. 15-cv-04327-EJD 13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ALLY FINANCIAL, INC. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 14 Plaintiff, vs. 15 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; EQUIFAX, INC.; TRANSUNION, 16 LLC; SEVENTH, AVE.; ALLY FINANCIAL, INC.; ASHRO, INC.; GOLDEN 1 CREDIT 17 UNION; PATIENT ACCOUNTING SERVICE CENTER, LLC AND DOES 1 18 THROUGH 100 INCLUSIVE, 19 Defendant. 20 21 Plaintiff MARY INGRAM( “Plaintiff and defendant ALLY FINANCIAL, INC. ”) 22 ( “Defendant ) hereby stipulate as follows: ” 23 24 RECITALS 1. Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant in the Superior Court of California, 25 County of Santa Clara on September 15, 2015 and served Defendant on September 28, 2015. 26 Defendant’s initial deadline to respond to the Complaint was October 28, 2015. This action was 27 removed to this Court on September 22, 2015. 28 07462.0497/5265000.1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ALLY FINANCIAL, INC. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 1 2. Plaintiff has agreed to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint 2 up to and including December 15, 2015, so that Defendant may have additional time to investigate 3 this matter and the parties may explore the possibility of settlement. 4 3. This change in deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already 5 fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 6 THEREFORE, the parties stipulate as follows: 7 8 STIPULATION 1. The deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint shall be continued to 9 December 15, 2015. 10 2. This change in deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already 11 fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 DATED: October 26, 2015 SAGARIA LAW, P.C. 14 By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale Elliot W. Gale 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARY INGRAM 16 17 18 DATED: October 26, 2015 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 19 By: 20 21 /s/ Alisa A. Givental Alisa A. Givental Attorneys for Defendant ALLY FINANCIAL, INC. 22 23 I, Alisa A. Givental, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 24 Stipulation. I hereby attest that Elliot W. Gale has concurred in this filing. /s/ Alisa A. Givental 25 26 27 28 07462.0497/5265000.1 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ALLY FINANCIAL, INC. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?