Martinez v. ReliaStar Life Insurance Company

Filing 19

ORDER GRANTING 18 STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/30/2015. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2015)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRlCT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID MARTINEZ CASE NO. 15-CV-04389-BLF Plaintiff(s), v. RELIASTARLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant(s). ---------------------------I Counsel report that they have met and confened regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The pruties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) r D 0 D (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conf erence with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may notfile this form. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeedfor ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) ~ivate ~ Process: Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediation with Doug deVries ofJudicate West The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ~ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) D Dated: iti Dated: other requested deadline - - - -- ----- - - -------- - - - - - - - - /v-t/; J t!/vi/; f CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE fPROPOSED] ORDER x 0 0 The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 30, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." Rev. 12/1 1 Page 2 of2 / 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I, Stacie Dirito, declare: 3 I am a citizen ofthe United States and employed in Contra Costa County, California. I am 4 over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address 5 is 2033 N. Main St., Suite 720, Walnut Creek, California 94596. On the date below, I served a 6 copy of the within document(s): 7 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 8 By transmission of the Notice of Electronic Filing by the Clerk on the CM/ECF participants. 9 0... .....l .....l 10 :r: t: :E 11 <fl "' "' "' :r: 12 1- 0 "' c::l Scott E. Shaffman 98 Del Monte Ave., Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940 Tel: (831) 333-0321 Fax: (831) 333-9012 13 sshaffman@aol.com 14 Attorneys for Plaint[[{ DAVID MARTINEZ L:.J 2 > 0 "' 0... 2 15 :E :r: u 16 I am readily familiar with the finn's practice of collection and processing correspondence 17 for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same 18 day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on 19 motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage 20 meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. < :J c::l 21 22 23 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on November 30, 2015, at Walnut Creek, California. 24 25 Stacie Dirito 26 27 28 50122.003/410330.1 PROOF OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?