Martinez v. ReliaStar Life Insurance Company
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING 18 STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/30/2015. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2015)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRlCT OF CALIFORNIA
DAVID MARTINEZ
CASE NO. 15-CV-04389-BLF
Plaintiff(s),
v.
RELIASTARLIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Defendant(s).
---------------------------I
Counsel report that they have met and confened regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The pruties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) r
D
0
D
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conf
erence with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may notfile this form. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
~ivate
~
Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediation with Doug
deVries ofJudicate West
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
~
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
D
Dated: iti
Dated:
other requested deadline - - - -- ----- - - -------- - - - - - - - -
/v-t/; J
t!/vi/; f
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
fPROPOSED] ORDER
x
0
0
The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 30, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."
Rev. 12/1 1
Page 2 of2
/
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
I, Stacie Dirito, declare:
3
I am a citizen ofthe United States and employed in Contra Costa County, California. I am
4
over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address
5
is 2033 N. Main St., Suite 720, Walnut Creek, California 94596. On the date below, I served a
6
copy of the within document(s):
7
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
8
By transmission of the Notice of Electronic Filing by the Clerk on the CM/ECF
participants.
9
0...
.....l
.....l
10
:r:
t:
:E
11
0
"'
0...
2
15
:E
:r:
u
16
I am readily familiar with the finn's practice of collection and processing correspondence
17
for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same
18
day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
19
motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage
20
meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
<
:J
c::l
21
22
23
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above
is true and correct.
Executed on November 30, 2015, at Walnut Creek, California.
24
25
Stacie Dirito
26
27
28
50122.003/410330.1
PROOF OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?