Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. M.A. Jones, Inc.

Filing 20

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES. Because the joint statement filed by the parties on February 25, 2016, does not comply with this portion of the Standing Order, the parties shall file, on or before March 3, 2016, a brief joint statement which provides the parties' proposed case management deadlines.In light of this order, the Case Management Conference scheduled for March 3, 2016, is VACATED and will be reset, if necessary, after the parties file the joint statement ordered herein. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/29/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 v. Case No. 5:15-cv-04469-EJD ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES M.A. JONES, INC., Defendant. 13 Pursuant to the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California, a joint 14 case management statement should provide “[p]roposed dates for designation of experts, discovery 15 cutoff, hearing of dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial.” Because the joint statement 16 filed by the parties on February 25, 2016, does not comply with this portion of the Standing Order, 17 the parties shall file, on or before March 3, 2016, a brief joint statement which provides the 18 parties’ proposed case management deadlines. 19 20 In light of this order, the Case Management Conference scheduled for March 3, 2016, is VACATED and will be reset, if necessary, after the parties file the joint statement ordered herein. 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 29, 2016 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:15-cv-04469-EJD ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?