Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. M.A. Jones, Inc.
Filing
20
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES. Because the joint statement filed by the parties on February 25, 2016, does not comply with this portion of the Standing Order, the parties shall file, on or before March 3, 2016, a brief joint statement which provides the parties' proposed case management deadlines.In light of this order, the Case Management Conference scheduled for March 3, 2016, is VACATED and will be reset, if necessary, after the parties file the joint statement ordered herein. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/29/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
v.
Case No. 5:15-cv-04469-EJD
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT
DEADLINES
M.A. JONES, INC.,
Defendant.
13
Pursuant to the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California, a joint
14
case management statement should provide “[p]roposed dates for designation of experts, discovery
15
cutoff, hearing of dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial.” Because the joint statement
16
filed by the parties on February 25, 2016, does not comply with this portion of the Standing Order,
17
the parties shall file, on or before March 3, 2016, a brief joint statement which provides the
18
parties’ proposed case management deadlines.
19
20
In light of this order, the Case Management Conference scheduled for March 3, 2016, is
VACATED and will be reset, if necessary, after the parties file the joint statement ordered herein.
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 29, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:15-cv-04469-EJD
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?