Sanchez v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.

Filing 44

AMENDED ORDER (1) CONDITIONALLY CERTIFYING THE SETTLEMENT CLASS; (2) PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; (3) APPOINTING PLAINTIFF AS THE CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AND HIS COUNSEL AS CLASS COUNSEL; (4) APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE CLASS NOTICE PACKET; AND (5) SETTING A HEARING FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/6/2018. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 B. James Fitzpatrick (SBN: 129056) Charles Swanston (SBN: 181882) FITZPATRICK, SPINI & SWANSTON 555 South Main Street Salinas, CA 93901 Telephone: (831) 755-1311 Facsimile: (831) 755-1319 Attorneys for Plaintiff, ALVARO SANCHEZ on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated employees 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN JOSE DIVISION ALVARO SANCHEZ on behalf of himself Case No.: 15-CV-04657-EJD and all other similarly situated employees, [Monterey County Superior Court Plaintiff, Case No. M132626] 13 v. 14 KEURIG GREEN MOUNTAIN, INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 10 11 AMENDED ORDER (1) CONDITIONALLY CERTIFYING THE SETTLEMENT CLASS; (2) PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; (3) APPOINTING PLAINTIFF AS THE CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AND HIS COUNSEL AS CLASS COUNSEL; (4) APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE CLASS NOTICE PACKET; AND (5) SETTING A HEARING FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Date: March 22, 2018 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: 4 Judge: Hon. Edward J. Davila 21 22 23 Complaint Filed: July 14, 2015 Notice of Removal Filed: October 7, 2015 24 25 Plaintiff Alvaro Sanchez’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Class Action Settlement 26 came on for hearing on March 22, 2018, in Courtroom 4 of this Court, the Honorable Edward J. 27 Davila presiding. Attorney B. James Fitzpatrick appeared on behalf of Plaintiff and attorney Jon 28 D. Cantor appeared on behalf of Defendant Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. (“Defendant”). This order replaces and supersedes the Court's preliminary approval order at Dkt. No. 41. -1Sanchez v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. Case No.: 15-CV-04657-EJD Amended Order Preliminarily Approving the Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement 1 2 The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff’s motion, the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Class to Dkt. No. 43 Action Settlement (“Settlement”) (attached hereto as as Exhibit A), along with the files and records 3 of this case, and oral argument made at the hearing, hereby FINDS, CONCLUDES, and ORDERS 4 as follows: 5 I. CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS 6 A. 7 For settlement purposes, the parties have proposed conditional certification of the following 8 Settlement Class settlement class (the “Class”): 9 All former non-exempt, hourly associates who worked for temporary staffing agencies, including but not limited to Select Staffing, at any time between July 14, 2011 and July 3, 2017 (the “Class Period”), who were assigned by such temporary staffing agencies to work at Defendant’s Castroville Plant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any temporary staff person who performed work and/or allegedly suffered violations of any law occurring while such person was in the employ of either Manpower US Inc. and/or any Manpower franchise and assigned to work at Defendant’s Castroville Plant during the applicable period shall not be considered a Class Member. 10 11 12 13 14 15 B. 16 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 the Court hereby certifies the Class for the sole and limited Conditional Certification 17 purpose of implementing the terms of the Settlement. Entry of this Order is without prejudice to 18 the rights of Defendant to oppose certification of a class in this action should the proposed 19 Settlement not be granted final approval 20 II. APPOINTMENT OF THE CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AND CLASS COUNSEL 21 A. 22 The Court finds and concludes that Plaintiff Alvaro Sanchez has claims typical of the Class Class Representative 23 Members and is an adequate representative of them. The Court hereby appoints Plaintiff Alvaro 24 Sanchez to serve as the Class Representative. 25 B. 26 The Court appoints Plaintiff’s counsel, Fitzpatrick, Spini & Swanston as Class Counsel. 27 28 III. Class Counsel PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT The Court has reviewed the terms of the Settlement, including the plan of allocation and -2- Sanchez v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. Case No.: 15-CV-04657-EJD Amended Order Preliminarily Approving the Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement 1 the release of claims. The Court has read and considered the declaration of B. James Fitzpatrick 2 in support of preliminary approval. Based on review of those papers, and the Court’s familiarity 3 with this case, the Court finds and concludes that the Settlement is the result of arms-length 4 negotiations between the parties conducted after Class Counsel had adequately investigated 5 Plaintiff’s claims and become familiar with their strengths and weaknesses. The assistance of an 6 experienced mediator in the settlement process confirms that the Settlement is non-collusive. 7 Based on all of these factors, the Court concludes that the proposed Settlement meets the criteria 8 for preliminary settlement approval. The Settlement has no obvious defects and falls within the 9 range of possible approval as fair, adequate, and reasonable, such that notice to the Class is 10 appropriate. 11 IV. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 APPROVAL OF THE CLASS NOTICE, OPT-OUT FORM, MAILING ENVELOPE AND MANNER OF DISTRIBUTION The parties have also submitted for this Court’s approval a proposed Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Hearing Date for Court Approval (attached as Exhibit 1 to the Settlement), proposed Opt-Out Form (attached as Exhibit 2 to the Settlement), and proposed mailing envelope (attached as Exhibit 3 to the Settlement) (collectively hereinafter referred to as the “Class Notice Packet”). The parties have also proposed a plan for distributing these documents in English and Spanish to Class Members after the Court grants preliminary approval of the Settlement. After carefully reviewing these documents and plan of distribution, the Court finds and concludes as follows: A. Best Notice Practicable The proposed Class Notice Packet is the best notice practicable under the circumstances and allows the Class Members a full and fair opportunity to consider the Settlement. The proposed mailing envelope has been designed to increase the chance that it will be opened by concisely and clearly identifying the nature of its contents. The Class Notice Packet fairly, plainly, accurately, and reasonably informs Class Members of: (1) appropriate information about the nature of this action, the definition of the Class, the identity of Class Counsel, and the essential terms of the Settlement, including the plan of allocation; (2) appropriate information -3Sanchez v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. Case No.: 15-CV-04657-EJD Amended Order Preliminarily Approving the Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement 1 about Plaintiff and Class Counsels’ forthcoming applications for the Class Representative’s 2 Service Payment and Class Counsels attorneys’ fees and costs; (3) appropriate information about 3 how settlement payments will be calculated, how to receive a settlement payment, the Class 4 Member’s estimated gross individual settlement payment under the Settlement, and the 5 procedures by which Class Members may contest Defendant’s records of their employment 6 history, which may affect their monetary recovery under the Settlement; (4) appropriate 7 information about this Court’s procedures for final approval of the Settlement, and about Class 8 Members’ right to appear if they desire; (5) appropriate information about how to object to or 9 elect not to participate in the Settlement, if a Class Member wishes to do so; and (6) appropriate 10 information as to how to obtain additional information regarding this action and the Settlement. 11 B. Plan of Distribution 12 The proposed plan for distributing the Class Notice Packet is a reasonable method to 13 reach all individuals who would be bound by the Settlement. Under this plan, Defendant will 14 provide the Settlement Administrator within fifteen (15) calendar days after the Court enters its 15 Preliminary Approval Order, for each Class Member, their name, last known mailing address, 16 last known telephone number, Social Security number, the dates of assignment at Defendant’s 17 Castroville, California facility during the Class Period, and the number of weeks worked by each 18 Class Member at Defendant’s Castroville, California facility during the Class Period (“Class 19 Information”). 20 Within twenty-one (21) days after the Settlement Administrator receives the Class 21 Information, the Settlement Administrator will mail, by first-class mail, the Class Notice Packets 22 in both English and Spanish to all Class Members at their last known address, unless modified by 23 any updated address information that the Settlement Administrator obtains in the course of 24 administration of the Settlement. Prior to the mailing of the Class Notice Packets, the Settlement 25 Administrator will update any new address information for Class Members as may be available 26 through the National Change of Address database or equivalent system. 27 28 The Settlement Administrator will trace all returned undeliverable Class Notice Packets and re-mail them to the most recent address available no later than seven (7) calendar days -4Sanchez v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. Case No.: 15-CV-04657-EJD Amended Order Preliminarily Approving the Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement 1 following receipt of the returned mail. For any Class Notice Packets returned to the Settlement 2 Administrator without a forwarding address, the Settlement Administrator shall conduct a skip- 3 trace and shall promptly re-mail the Class Notice Packet to any newly found address or 4 addresses. The re-mailed Class Notice Packet shall be identical to the original Class Notice. 5 6 The Settlement Administrator will take all other necessary action in furtherance of the administration of the Settlement as are specified in the Settlement Agreement. 7 C. 8 Accordingly, the Court finds and concludes that the proposed plan for distributing the 9 Class Notice Packet will provide the best notice practicable, satisfies all legal and due process 10 Approval requirements. Accordingly, the Court hereby orders as follows: 11 1. The Class Notice Packet is approved. The parties are authorized to make non- 12 substantive changes to the Class Notice Packet that are consistent with the terms of the 13 Settlement and this Order. 14 2. The manner of distributing the Class Notice Packet to the Class is approved. 15 3. Promptly following the entry of this Order, the Settlement Administrator will 16 prepare a final version of the Class Notice Packet, incorporating into it the relevant dates and 17 deadlines set forth in this Order. The Class Notice Packet will be initially prepared in English 18 and then, once finalized, translated into Spanish. 19 4. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Court for purposes of this Order adopts 20 all defined terms set forth in the Settlement. 21 V. PROCEDURES FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SETTLEMENT 22 A. Final Approval Hearing 23 The Court hereby schedules a hearing to determine whether to grant final approval of the 24 Settlement (the “Final Approval Hearing”) for July 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4 of this 25 Court, located at 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, California. 26 B. 27 No later than 10 court days before the Final Approval Hearing, Plaintiff will file a motion 28 Deadline for Submitting Motion Seeking Final Approval for final approval of the Settlement. -5Sanchez v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. Case No.: 15-CV-04657-EJD Amended Order Preliminarily Approving the Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement 1 C. Deadline for Motion for Class Counsels Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Award 2 No later than fourteen (14) calendar days before the deadline for Class Members to object 3 or opt-out from the Settlement, Plaintiff will file a motion for approval of Class Counsels 4 attorneys’ fees and costs. 5 heard concurrently with the motion for final approval. 6 D. 7 8 9 The motion for Class Counsels attorneys’ fees and costs shall be Deadline to Elect Not to Participate in the Settlement 1. Form of Election Class Members may exclude themselves from participating in the Settlement. To do so, the Class Member must submit a completed Opt-Out Form by mail to the Settlement 10 Administrator and postmarked on or before the deadline. The date of the postmark on the return 11 mailing envelope shall be the exclusive means used to determine whether an Opt-Out Form has 12 been timely submitted. 13 14 2. Deadline for Submitting an Opt-Out Request Class Members will have sixty (60) calendar days after the date on which the Settlement 15 Administrator mails the Class Notice Packets to submit to the Settlement Administrator a valid 16 Opt-Out Form. A valid Opt-Out Form will be deemed timely submitted to the Settlement 17 Administrator if it is mailed to the Settlement Administrator by first-class mail and postmarked 18 by no later than sixty (60) calendar days after the Settlement Administrator first mails the Class 19 Notice Packets to the Class Members. Only those Class Members who submit a completed Opt- 20 Out Form within the time and by the manner set forth in this Order will be excluded from the 21 Settlement. The Settlement will have no binding effect on any Class Member who properly 22 elects not to participate in the Settlement in the manner required by this Order. 23 E. Defendant’s Right to Rescind the Settlement Agreement 24 Defendant may, at its election, rescind the Settlement and all actions taken in its 25 furtherance of it will be thereby null and void, if more than 10% of the Class Members opt-out of 26 the Settlement. Defendant must exercise this right of rescission, in writing, within seven (7) 27 calendar days after the Settlement Administrator first notifies the parties that the conditions 28 expressed in this paragraph have been satisfied. -6Sanchez v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. Case No.: 15-CV-04657-EJD Amended Order Preliminarily Approving the Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement 1 F. Deadline for Filing Objections to Settlement 2 Any Class Member who wishes to object to the fairness, reasonableness, or adequacy of 3 the Settlement must do so in writing, and filed with the Court no later than sixty (60) calendar 4 days after the date that the Class Notice Packets are first mailed to Class Members by the 5 Settlement Administrator. Any Class Member who submits a valid and timely Opt-Out Form 6 will not have standing, and is barred from objecting to the Settlement. Any Class Member who 7 does not timely file a written objection will not be permitted to raise such objection, except for 8 good cause shown, and any Class Member who fails to object in the manner prescribed by this 9 Order will be deemed to have waived, and will be foreclosed from raising, any such objection. 10 Class Members who have timely objected to the Settlement in writing may also appear and speak 11 at the Final Approval Hearing if they have provided advance notice to the Court of their intention 12 to do so. 13 VI. RELEASE OF CLAIMS 14 If, at the Final Approval Hearing, this Court grants final approval to the Settlement, 15 Plaintiff and every Class Member who does not validly and timely opt-out of the Settlement will, 16 pursuant to the Settlement, be adjudicated to have granted the release of claims as set forth in the 17 Settlement. 18 VII. 19 APPOINTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR Simpluris, Inc. is hereby appointed the Settlement Administrator to carry out the duties 20 set forth in this Order and the Settlement. 21 VIII. CY PRES RECIPIENT 22 The Class Members shall have 180 calendar days to cash their settlement checks. Checks 23 allocated to Class Members who cannot be located during the notice process shall be cancelled 24 by the Claims Administrator who shall promptly place the funds in a Reserve Fund to be used to 25 pay amounts allocated to Class Members who cannot be located within the time provided, but 26 who are later located up to six months after the Effective Date, and who are otherwise qualified 27 for such payment. All payments made from the Reserve Fund shall be made as soon as 28 practicable after the Class Members are located. Any funds remaining in the Reserve Fund after -7Sanchez v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. Case No.: 15-CV-04657-EJD Amended Order Preliminarily Approving the Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement 1 six months and any remaining funds from “uncashed checks” shall be distributed to the 2 Watsonville Law Center (www.watsonvillelawcenter.org) which provides free legal services to 3 low-income individuals on the Central Coast. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 April 6, 2018 Date: ________________ _______________________________ Honorable Judge Edward J. Davila United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -8Sanchez v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. Case No.: 15-CV-04657-EJD Amended Order Preliminarily Approving the Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?