Maranon v. Santa Clara Stadium Authority et al
Filing
23
ORDER GRANTING 22 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONDUCT THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 1/25/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
E-mail: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Anthony Maranon
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
ANTHONY MARANON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
SANTA CLARA STADIUM AUTHORITY; )
CITY OF SANTA CLARA; FORTY NINERS )
)
STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
)
LLC;
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
No. 5:15-cv-04709-BLF
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
PARTIES TO CONDUCT THE JOINT
SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED BY
GENERAL ORDER 56 AND THE
SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Complaint filed: October 12, 2015
Trial Date:
None set
20
Plaintiff, Anthony Maranon (“Maranon”), and Defendants, Santa Clara Stadium
21
Authority, City of Santa Clara, and Forty Niners Stadium Management Company LLC
22
(collectively “Defendants,” and together with Maranon, “the Parties”), by and through their
23
respective attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
24
1.
All parties named in the action have been served and have appeared.
25
2.
This action arises in part out of Maranon’s claim that Defendants discriminated
26
against him by denying him full and equal access to the Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara,
27
California (“the Stadium”) on account of his disability, specifically that he must use a
28
wheelchair for mobility, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”).
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1
1
Accordingly, this matter proceeds under this Court’s General Order 56 which governs ADA
2
access actions.
3
3.
The Court issued a “Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of
4
Access Under Americans with Disabilities Act Title II and III” on October 13, 2015 (Dkt. 4).
5
The Scheduling Order set the last date for a Joint Site Inspection of the Stadium as January 26,
6
2016. This Joint Site Inspection is required under General Order 56.
7
4.
The Parties have agreed that in order to address Maranon’s claims for injunctive
8
relief, two joint site inspections will take place: one when the Stadium is in full operation so
9
that the policies and practices of the Stadium while in use can be evaluated; and the other when
10
the Stadium is not operational in order to as efficiently as possible inspect the architectural
11
conditions at the Stadium.
12
5.
Due to the availability of counsel, their consultants, the Parties, and the
13
schedule of the Stadium itself (for which limited events are available for purposes of the
14
operational inspection), the Parties have agreed to conduct the non-operational inspection on
15
Friday, April 8, 2016, and the operational inspection on Saturday, April 9, 2016.
16
6.
The Parties acknowledge that the proposed dates for the two site inspections fall
17
outside the January 26, 2016 date set by the Scheduling Order to complete the Joint Site
18
Inspection. The Parties have been working together cooperatively to reach an agreeable
19
schedule for what is a large undertaking, and for which there are multiple schedules to consider
20
and accommodate. The Parties believe that the two site inspections will yield the greatest
21
possibility that, at a minimum, Maranon’s claims under the ADA can be resolved through
22
settlement.
23
7.
The Parties therefore believe that good cause exists to extend the last date to
24
complete the Joint Site Inspection from January 26, 2016 to April 9, 2016 as they continue to
25
work together to identify, and try to resolve, Maranon’s claims for injunctive relief, and the
26
Parties therefore stipulate to such an extension pending the Court’s approval.
27
///
28
///
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3
Dated: January 21, 2016
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
4
5
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
TANYA E. MOORE
Attorney for Plaintiff
ANTHONY MARANON
6
7
8
LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP
9
10
11
/s/ Kara A. Abelson
KARA A. ABELSON
MATTHEW S. CONANT
Attorneys for Defendants
SANTA CLARA STADIUM AUTHORITY,
CITY OF SANTA CLARA, and FORTY
NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT
COMPANY LLC
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
I attest that the original signature of the person whose electronic signature is shown above is
maintained by me, and that her concurrence in the filing of this document and attribution of her
signature was obtained.
20
21
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore, Attorney for
Plaintiff, ANTHONY MARANON
///
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 3
1
ORDER
2
The Parties having so stipulated, and good cause appearing,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the last date for the Parties to conduct the Joint Site
4
Inspection required both under the Scheduling Order and General Order 56 is continued to
5
April 9, 2016. All other dates and deadlines triggered by the date of the Joint Site Inspection
6
are continued accordingly.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
Dated: January 25, 2016
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?