Maranon v. Santa Clara Stadium Authority et al

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING 22 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONDUCT THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 1/25/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 E-mail: tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Anthony Maranon 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ANTHONY MARANON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) SANTA CLARA STADIUM AUTHORITY; ) CITY OF SANTA CLARA; FORTY NINERS ) ) STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY ) LLC; ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) No. 5:15-cv-04709-BLF STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONDUCT THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED BY GENERAL ORDER 56 AND THE SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER Complaint filed: October 12, 2015 Trial Date: None set 20 Plaintiff, Anthony Maranon (“Maranon”), and Defendants, Santa Clara Stadium 21 Authority, City of Santa Clara, and Forty Niners Stadium Management Company LLC 22 (collectively “Defendants,” and together with Maranon, “the Parties”), by and through their 23 respective attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 24 1. All parties named in the action have been served and have appeared. 25 2. This action arises in part out of Maranon’s claim that Defendants discriminated 26 against him by denying him full and equal access to the Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, 27 California (“the Stadium”) on account of his disability, specifically that he must use a 28 wheelchair for mobility, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 1 1 Accordingly, this matter proceeds under this Court’s General Order 56 which governs ADA 2 access actions. 3 3. The Court issued a “Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of 4 Access Under Americans with Disabilities Act Title II and III” on October 13, 2015 (Dkt. 4). 5 The Scheduling Order set the last date for a Joint Site Inspection of the Stadium as January 26, 6 2016. This Joint Site Inspection is required under General Order 56. 7 4. The Parties have agreed that in order to address Maranon’s claims for injunctive 8 relief, two joint site inspections will take place: one when the Stadium is in full operation so 9 that the policies and practices of the Stadium while in use can be evaluated; and the other when 10 the Stadium is not operational in order to as efficiently as possible inspect the architectural 11 conditions at the Stadium. 12 5. Due to the availability of counsel, their consultants, the Parties, and the 13 schedule of the Stadium itself (for which limited events are available for purposes of the 14 operational inspection), the Parties have agreed to conduct the non-operational inspection on 15 Friday, April 8, 2016, and the operational inspection on Saturday, April 9, 2016. 16 6. The Parties acknowledge that the proposed dates for the two site inspections fall 17 outside the January 26, 2016 date set by the Scheduling Order to complete the Joint Site 18 Inspection. The Parties have been working together cooperatively to reach an agreeable 19 schedule for what is a large undertaking, and for which there are multiple schedules to consider 20 and accommodate. The Parties believe that the two site inspections will yield the greatest 21 possibility that, at a minimum, Maranon’s claims under the ADA can be resolved through 22 settlement. 23 7. The Parties therefore believe that good cause exists to extend the last date to 24 complete the Joint Site Inspection from January 26, 2016 to April 9, 2016 as they continue to 25 work together to identify, and try to resolve, Maranon’s claims for injunctive relief, and the 26 Parties therefore stipulate to such an extension pending the Court’s approval. 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 2 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 Dated: January 21, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 4 5 /s/ Tanya E. Moore TANYA E. MOORE Attorney for Plaintiff ANTHONY MARANON 6 7 8 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP 9 10 11 /s/ Kara A. Abelson KARA A. ABELSON MATTHEW S. CONANT Attorneys for Defendants SANTA CLARA STADIUM AUTHORITY, CITY OF SANTA CLARA, and FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I attest that the original signature of the person whose electronic signature is shown above is maintained by me, and that her concurrence in the filing of this document and attribution of her signature was obtained. 20 21 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore, Attorney for Plaintiff, ANTHONY MARANON /// STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 3 1 ORDER 2 The Parties having so stipulated, and good cause appearing, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the last date for the Parties to conduct the Joint Site 4 Inspection required both under the Scheduling Order and General Order 56 is continued to 5 April 9, 2016. All other dates and deadlines triggered by the date of the Joint Site Inspection 6 are continued accordingly. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 Dated: January 25, 2016 BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?