Melcher v. Richardson et al

Filing 16

ORDER CORRECTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Due to an administrative error, the clerk's 12/1/2015 notice 11 set a briefing schedule inconsistent with the Bankruptcy Local Rules of the Northern District of California. This order corrects and superse des that notice. Appellant's opening brief is due 12/29/2015. Appellee shall serve a brief within 21 days after service of appellant's brief. The appellant may serve and file a reply brief within 14 days after service of appellee's bri ef. If the appellee has filed a cross-appeal, the appellee may file and serve a reply brief to the response of the appellant to the issues presented in the cross-appeal within 14 days after service of the reply brief of the appellant.Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/15/2015. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/15/2015: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (amk, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

JACQUELINE C. MELCHER,

Case No. 5:15-cv-04726-RMW
Bk. No. 01-53251

Appellant,
13
v.

ORDER CORRECTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

14
15

JOHN W. RICHARDSON, TRUSTEE,

Re: Dkt. No. 11

Appellee.
16
17

The Record on Appeal in the above matter was entered in the docket of this Court on

18

December 1, 2015. On December 2, 2015, the clerk of the court mailed a Notice of Briefing to the

19

parties. Dkt. No. 11, 11-1. Due to an administrative error, the clerk’s notice incorrectly referred to

20

the above case as “USA v. Richardson” and set a briefing schedule inconsistent with the

21

Bankruptcy Local Rules of the Northern District of California. This order corrects and supersedes

22

Dkt. No. 11.

23
24
25
26
27

Pursuant to B.L.R. 8010-1 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8018, and unless the assigned District
Judge orders otherwise for good cause shown:
The appellant shall serve and file a brief not exceeding 25 pages in length within 28 days
after entry of the appeal on the District Court’s docket.
The appellee shall serve and file a brief not exceeding 25 pages in length within 21 days
1

28
5:15-cv-04726-RMW
ORDER CORRECTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RS

1

after service of appellant’s brief. If the appellee has filed a cross-appeal, the brief of appellee shall

2

contain the issues and arguments pertinent to the cross-appeal, denominated as such, and the

3

response to the brief of the appellant.

4

The appellant may serve and file a reply brief not exceeding 15 pages in length within 14

5

days after service of appellee’s brief, and if the appellee has filed a cross-appeal, the appellee may

6

file and serve a reply brief not exceeding 15 pages in length to the response of the appellant to the

7

issues presented in the cross-appeal within 14 days after service of the reply brief of the appellant.

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Pursuant to B.L.R 8012-1, upon completion of the briefing, the assigned District Judge will
set a date for oral argument, if needed; otherwise the matter will be deemed submitted for
decision.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 15, 2015
______________________________________
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

2

28
5:15-cv-04726-RMW
ORDER CORRECTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RS