Rueppel et al v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. et al

Filing 45

ORDER GRANTING 44 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/15/2017. The Clerk shall close this file. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA YU | MOHANDESI LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, CA 90071 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ERIK RUEPPEL, an individual APRIL RUEPPEL, an individual vs. Plaintiffs, Case No. 5:15-cv-4746-EJD [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE RESURGENT MORTGAGE SERVICING; SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING; THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR CWALT 2005-16; and DOES 1 through 10, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 1 Having considered the parties’ joint stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 2 that this action is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 9 September 15, 2017 Dated: ___________________, 2017 ________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 YU | MOHANDESI LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, CA 90071 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –1– [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I certify that on September 15, 2017, a copy of the foregoing was filed and 3 served electronically in the ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to the 4 parties of record by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system as described 5 below. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system. 6 7 8 DATED: September 15, 2017 By /s/ Neeru Jindal Neeru Jindal 9 10 YU | MOHANDESI LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, CA 90071 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?