Rueppel et al v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. et al
Filing
45
ORDER GRANTING 44 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/15/2017. The Clerk shall close this file. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
YU | MOHANDESI LLP
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 2800
Los Angeles, CA 90071
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
ERIK RUEPPEL, an individual
APRIL RUEPPEL, an individual
vs.
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 5:15-cv-4746-EJD
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING STIPULATION TO
DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
RESURGENT MORTGAGE
SERVICING; SHELLPOINT
MORTGAGE SERVICING; THE BANK
OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR
CWALT 2005-16; and DOES 1 through
10, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
1
Having considered the parties’ joint stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
2
that this action is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
3
41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
September 15, 2017
Dated: ___________________, 2017
________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
YU | MOHANDESI LLP
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 2800
Los Angeles, CA 90071
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–1–
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I certify that on September 15, 2017, a copy of the foregoing was filed and
3
served electronically in the ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to the
4
parties of record by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system as described
5
below. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system.
6
7
8
DATED: September 15, 2017
By
/s/ Neeru Jindal
Neeru Jindal
9
10
YU | MOHANDESI LLP
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 2800
Los Angeles, CA 90071
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?