Abhijit Prasad v. Santa Clara County Department of Social Services et al
Filing
127
Order by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi Rejecting 126 Third Discovery Letter Brief for Failure to Comply with Court Order. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
ABHIJIT PRASAD,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
GAIL SIMMONS, et al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No.15-cv-04933-BLF (VKD)
Defendants.
12
ORDER REJECTING THIRD
DISCOVERY DISPUTE LETTER FOR
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT
ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 126
13
On February 5, 2019, the parties submitted a third joint discovery dispute letter concerning
14
matters relating to Mr. Prasad’s deposition. Dkt. No. 126. This joint discovery dispute letter does
15
not comply with the discovery dispute procedures outlined in Court’s Standing Order for Civil
16
Cases in at least two respects.
First, Mr. Prasad’s statement of his position exceeds the 1,500-word limit by 435 words.
17
18
Second, the parties do not attest to compliance with the requirement that lead counsel for the
19
parties confer about the discovery dispute, and, in fact, the letter suggests that the parties failed to
20
meet and confer at all. Dkt. No. 126 at 1.
21
The parties may resubmit their dispute to the Court after engaging in a meaningful
22
conference of lead counsel. See Standing Order for Civil Cases at 3 (“Unjustified delay or refusal
23
to participate meaningfully in the conference of lead counsel or the preparation of the joint
24
discovery letter may be grounds for entry of an order adverse to the delaying or non-participating
25
party or other appropriate sanctions.”). Any resubmitted joint discovery dispute letter must
26
comply with the Court’s Standing Order for Civil Cases.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
///
1
Dated: February 6, 2019
2
3
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
United States Magistrate Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?