Sulyma v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee et al

Filing 106

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME 105 . Motion to Dismiss 103 and Case Management Conference set for 8/10/2016 1:00 PM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. Opposition due by 6/23/2016. Reply due by 7/13/2106. Updated Case Management Statement due by 8/3/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/7/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

R. Joseph Barton (Cal. Bar No. 212340)
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS &
TOLL PLLC
1100 New York Ave., NW
Suite 500, East Tower
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Joseph A. Creitz (Cal. Bar No. 169552)
CREITZ & SEREBIN LLP
250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Interim Class Counsel
Scott P. Cooper (Cal. Bar No. 96905)
Jennifer L. Jones (Cal. Bar No. 284624)
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3200
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

18
19

Gregory Y. Porter (pro hac vice)
Ryan T. Jenny (pro hac vice)
BAILEY & GLASSER LLP
1054 31st Street, NW, Suite 230
Washington, D.C. 20007
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:: [e-mail]

John J. Buckley, Jr. (pro hac vice)
Daniel F. Katz (pro hac vice)
Vidya Atre Mirmira (pro hac vice)
Hyung-Jin P. Kim (pro hac vice)
David S. Kurtzer-Ellenbogen (pro hac vice)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -

21

SAN JOSE DIVISION

22
23

CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA,
Plaintiff,

24
25

v.

Case No. 5:15-cv-04977-NC
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF
DEADLINES REGARDING DEFENDANTS’
PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS, AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, and ORDER

26
27
28

SULYMA v. INTEL, No. 15-cv-4977-NC
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES
And ORDER
1

1

INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT
POLICY COMMITTEE, et al.,

2
3
4
5
6

Complaint filed: October 29, 2015

Defendants,
and
INTEL 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN and
INTEL RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION
PLAN,
Nominal Defendants.

7
8
9

Whereas Plaintiff’s counsel have requested, and Defendants agree, to a two-week

10

extension of time for Plaintiff to file his Opposition to Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss

11

(Dkt. Entry 103); and

12

Whereas Defendants therefore request and Plaintiff agrees, to a two-week extension of

13

time to file Defendants’ Reply memorandum in support of their pending Motion to Dismiss; and

14

Whereas the Hearing on said Motion to Dismiss is currently scheduled for, July 6, 2016,

15

the same day as the upcoming Case Management Conference, and said Hearing will need to be

16

continued if the above-referenced extensions are granted,

17

THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, and for the reasons stated in

18

the accompanying Declaration of Joseph A. Creitz, Plaintiff and Defendants hereby stipulate to

19

the following briefing schedule on Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss and three-week

20

continuation of the hearing date on the motion and also the currently scheduled Case

21

Management Conference.

22

///

23

///

24
25
26
27
28

SULYMA v. INTEL, No. 15-cv-4977-NC
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES
And ORDER
2

1
2
3
4
5
6

The existing and new requested dates are as follows:
Current
Date

Proposed Date

Event

06/09/2016

06/23/2016

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

06/16/2016

07/13/2016

Defendants’ Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss

06/29/2016

08/03/2016

Joint Case Management Conference Statement Due

07/06/2016

08/10/2016

Case Management Conference, and Hearing on Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss

7
8
9
10

As set forth in the accompanying Declaration of Joseph A. Creitz, good cause exists to

11

extend the above-noted deadlines. Plaintiff requires additional time to prepare his Opposition to

12

Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss, and Defendants will need a corresponding two-week

13

extension to prepare their reply and to allow time for each of the 21 Defendants to review,

14

comment on, and consent to the Reply, particularly so close to the Fourth of July weekend. The

15

current Hearing for the Motion to Dismiss is set for the same date as the Case Management

16

Conference. Because judicial efficiency will be promoted by the Court having the benefit of full

17

briefing on the Motion to Dismiss at the Conference, it is respectfully requested that the date of

18

both the Conference and the Hearing be continued to August 10, 2016 or some other later date

19

convenient to the Court when counsel also are available.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

SULYMA v. INTEL, No. 15-cv-4977-NC
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES
And ORDER
3

1

Dated: _____________, 2016

2

By: /s/ Joseph A. Creitz
Joseph A. Creitz (Cal. Bar No. 169552)
CREITZ & SEREBIN LLP
250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

3
4
5
6

Attorney for Plaintiff

7
By: /s/ John J. Buckley, Jr.

8

John J. Buckley, Jr.
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10
11
12

Attorney for Defendants

13
14

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

15
16
17

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that I have obtained the
concurrence of all signatories other than myself in the filing of this document.

18

/s/ Joseph A. Creitz
Joseph A. Creitz

19
20

22

Dated: June 7, 2016

R NIA

Cousins

FO

.
thanael M
Judge Na

SULYMA v. INTEL, No. 15-cv-4977-NC
E
C
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES R N
OF
D IS T IC T
And ORDER
4
R

H

28

RT

27

NO

26

LI

25

_________________________________________
Hon. Nathanael Cousins NTED
GRA
United States Magistrate Judge

A

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

UNIT
ED

23

S

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

21