Sulyma v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee et al
Filing
95
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. Re: Dkt. No. 94 . The parties are to meet and confer to resolve remaining issues. Joint proposed protective order must be filed by 5/13/2016, or the Court will set the matter for hearing on 5/18/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/6/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA, et al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 15-cv-04977 NC
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER
v.
INTEL CORPORATION
INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE,
et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 94
Defendants.
16
17
The parties have submitted separate proposed protective orders and now ask the
18
Court to choose between them. Dkt. No. 94. The Court’s view is that the proposed orders
19
are similar, and it orders the parties to meet and confer to resolve the remaining issues.
20
They must file a joint proposed protective order by May 13, 2016, or the Court will set the
21
matter for a hearing on May 18, 2016.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: May 6, 2016
26
27
28
Case No. 15-cv-04977 NC
_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?