Sulyma v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee et al

Filing 95

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. Re: Dkt. No. 94 . The parties are to meet and confer to resolve remaining issues. Joint proposed protective order must be filed by 5/13/2016, or the Court will set the matter for hearing on 5/18/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/6/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA, et al., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 15-cv-04977 NC ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER v. INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 94 Defendants. 16 17 The parties have submitted separate proposed protective orders and now ask the 18 Court to choose between them. Dkt. No. 94. The Court’s view is that the proposed orders 19 are similar, and it orders the parties to meet and confer to resolve the remaining issues. 20 They must file a joint proposed protective order by May 13, 2016, or the Court will set the 21 matter for a hearing on May 18, 2016. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: May 6, 2016 26 27 28 Case No. 15-cv-04977 NC _____________________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?