Rojas v. Michael F. Wallau Enterprises, Inc. et al
Filing
12
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE 11 . Case Management Conference set for 4/20/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. Case Management Statement due by 4/13/2106. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/10/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555
HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196
Justice at Work Law Group
84 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 790
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: (408) 317-1100
Facsimile: (408) 351-0105
Tomas@JAWLawGroup.com
Huy@JAWLawGroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ALVARO PENA ROJAS and
HUMERTO VILLEGAS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
ALVARO PENA ROJAS and HUMERTO
VILLEGAS,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
v.
MICHAEL F. WALLAU ENTERPRISES,
INC.; MICAHEL F. WALLAU,
Defendants.
Case No.: 15-CV-05002-NC
MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDERS;
DECLARATION OF TOMAS E.
MARGAIN; ORDER
CIVIL L.R. 6-3; FRCP RULE 6(b)(1)
16
17
TO ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD IN THIS ACTION.
18
Notice is hereby given that Plaintiffs move to continue the Initial Case Management
19
Conference from February 17, 2016 to Wednesday April 20, 2016 as Defendants have not yet
20
been served despite three service attempts. The related Rule 26 and ADR Deadlines are also
21
requested to be moved according to the proposed April 20, 2016 date. This motion is based on
22
CIVIL L.R. 6-3 and FRCP RULE 6(b)(1) and is supported by the Declaration of Tomas E.
23
Margain, the Court’s File and the proposed Order filed herein.
FOR PLAINTIFFS
DATED:
February 10, 2016
By: //s// Tomas E. Margain
Tomas E. Margain
24
25
-1MOTION TO CONTINUE
DECLARATION OF TOMAS E. MARGAIN IN SUPPORT
1
I, TOMAS E. MARGAIN, declare as follows:
2
1.
I am an attorney duly authorized to practice before this Court and Plaintiff’s
3
attorney of record in this action. I base this declaration on my personal knowledge unless
4
otherwise indicated.
5
6
7
8
2.
only included one Plaintiff, ALVARO PENA ROJAS. However, after filing the Compliant, I
was hired by another former employee HUMERTO VILLEGAS who was added to the lawsuit
by the filing of a First Amended Complaint on January 12, 2016. Docket 5.
9
10
3.
13
4.
To date I have attempted to serve Defendants on three occasions the first attempt
being on January 28, 2016. I am attaching as Exhibit 1 a true and correct copy of an email from
my process server One Legal.
14
15
I was delayed in serving the Complaint because I wanted to wait until the
Complaint was amended to then serve Defendants.
11
12
This lawsuit was filed on October 30, 2015. Docket 1. The Original Complaint
5.
I attempted to serve Defendants at the home of Michael Wallau and not his
restaurant. This was the address listed with the Secretary of State. However, based on the three
16
failed attempts, I am going to serve Mr. Wallau at his restaurant to make sure there are no more
17
delays.
18
19
20
I declare under penalties of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing
is true and accurate. Executed in San Jose, Santa Clara California.
Dated: February 10, 2016.
21
By: ____//s// Tomas Margain__________
Tomas E. Margain
22
23
24
25
-2MOTION TO CONTINUE
MOTION
1
The Court both under its inherent authority and under CIVIL L.R. 6-3; FRCP RULE
2
6(b)(1) has the authority to change and modify deadlines. The Court can also extend the time by
3
which a Defendant can respond to the Complaint.
4
5
6
7
Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Initial Case Management Conference and related
deadlines be continued approximately 60 days to Wednesday April 20, 2016. This will allow the
First Amended Complaint to be served and give Defendants time to hire counsel and make an
appearance.
8
The requested new dates are as follows:
9
(1) April 4, 2016 shall be the last day to:
10
•
11
•
•
12
13
14
15
16
17
(2)
•
•
•
meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and
discovery plans;
file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel
file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference
April 13, 2016 shall be the last day to:
File Rule 26(f) Report,
complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and
file Case Management Statement per attached Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case
Management Statement
(3) The Initial Case Management Conference will be set for April 20, 2016 (Tuesday) in the
Ronald Dellums Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612 at 1:30 PM.
18
19
Dated: February 10, 2016
By: ____//s// Tomas Margain__________
Tomas E. Margain
20
21
22
23
24
25
-3MOTION TO CONTINUE
1
2
ALVARO PENA ROJAS and HUMERTO
VILLEGAS,
3
Plaintiffs,
4
Case No.: 15-CV-05002-NC
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
CONTINUE
CIVIL L.R. 6-3; FRCP RULE 6(b)(1)
v.
5
6
7
MICHAEL F. WALLAU ENTERPRISES,
INC.; MICAHEL F. WALLAU,
Defendants.
8
9
Based on good cause the Court hereby modifies and continues the initial Deadlines as
follows:
10
(1) April 4, 2016 shall be the last day to:
11
•
12
•
•
13
meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and
discovery plans;
file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel
file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference
14
18
19
20
(3) The Initial Case Management Conference will be set for April 20, 2016 (Wednesday) in the
Robert F. Peckham Federal Building, 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, CA 9511394612 at 10:00
AM.
Defendants are ordered to file a Consent/Declination to have this matter heard by a
Magistrate Judge on or before April 4, 2016
21
S
Dated: February 10, 2016
By:
UNIT
ED
TED
NATHANAEL RACOUSINS
GM. N
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
. Cousins
thanael M
Judge Na
24
NO
25
RT
FO
23
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ER
H
-4MOTION TO CONTINUE
R NIA
17
April 13, 2016 shall be the last day to:
File Rule 26(f) Report,
complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and
file Case Management Statement per attached Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case
Management Statement
LI
16
(2)
•
•
•
A
15
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?