Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. Apple Inc.

Filing 175

CASE SCHEDULING ORDER re 173 . Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on December 21, 2015 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CORE WIRELESS LICENSING S.A.R.L., Plaintiff, 8 10 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 12 Based on the parties’ joint case management statement1 and the case management conference, 14 IT IS ORDERED that the presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to this case. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (Re: Docket No. 173) APPLE INC, 11 15 CASE SCHEDULING ORDER v. 9 13 Case No. 15-cv-05008-PSG IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties will bring any discovery disputes to the court through a letter briefing procedure. If, after conducting good faith meet-and-confer efforts in person or by telephone, counsel are unable to resolve a discovery dispute, the moving party shall file with the court a letter brief no longer than 4 pages outlining the issues in dispute and the requested relief. Within 7 days, the opposing party may file a letter brief no longer than 4 pages explaining its position on the disputed issues. If necessary, the court will schedule a hearing, which the parties may attend telephonically. The court will resolve the dispute either by a written order or on the record at the hearing. 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Apple, Inc. may file a renewed motion to 25 26 27 28 1 See Docket No. 173. 1 Case No. 15-cv-05008-PSG CASE SCHEDULING ORDER 1 dismiss Plaintiff Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l.’s contract and related declaratory judgment 2 claims no later than January 14, 2016. The parties will brief the motion in accordance with Civ. 3 L.R. 7. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the parties’ substantial progress in the claim 5 construction process before this case was transferred to this court, a full set of claim construction 6 briefing is unnecessary. Instead, in addition to the joint claim construction and prehearing 7 statement, each party will submit a single claim construction brief not to exceed 25 pages in length 8 by March 24, 2016.2 Neither party may adopt or argue a claim construction position that is 9 inconsistent with a position that the party advanced in its prior briefing in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are referred to United States Magistrate 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Judge Howard Lloyd for a settlement conference. The parties shall contact Judge Lloyd directly to 12 schedule the conference. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following schedule and deadlines shall apply to this 13 14 case: 15 Deadline to File Motion to Dismiss .................................................................January 14, 2016 16 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Pat. L.R. 4-3) .............February 18, 2016 17 Deadline to Submit Technical Tutorials (if any) ................................................March 10, 2016 18 Claim Construction Briefing Deadline ...............................................................March 24, 2016 19 Markman Hearing ................................................................................................April 18, 2016 20 Fact Discovery Cut-Off ........................................................................................... June 2, 2016 21 Opening Expert Reports .......................................................................................... July 7, 2016 22 Rebuttal Expert Reports ........................................................................................ July 28, 2016 23 Dispositive Motions Filing Deadline ............................................................ September 1, 2016 Dispositive Motions Hearing ..................................................... October 18, 2016 at 10:00 AM 24 Pre-Trial Conference .............................................................. November 15, 2016 at 10:00 AM 25 26 27 28 2 The parties may stipulate to a different page limit, subject to the court’s approval. 2 Case No. 15-cv-05008-PSG CASE SCHEDULING ORDER 1 Jury Trial .................................................................................... December 5, 2016 at 9:30 AM 2 SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: December 21, 2015 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 15-cv-05008-PSG CASE SCHEDULING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?