Merriweather v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING 20 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Audrey Merriweather. Rudolph Incorporated terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/29/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2016)

Case 5:15-cv-05131-EJD Document 20 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 2

S

E R DATED: 2/29/2016 C
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R

H

8

R NIA

. D av i l a

FO

RT

J

w a rd J
u d ge E d

LI

IT

RDER
S SO O
I

A

UNIT
ED

ED

NO

7

RT
U
O

1 Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)
Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)
2 Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)
SAGARIA LAW, P.C.
3 2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor
San Jose, California 95110
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN JOSE DIVISION

10
11
AUDREY MERRIWEATHER,

Federal Case No.: 5:15-CV-05131-EJD

12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
15 INC.; et. al.,
16

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT RUDOLPH
INCORPORATED PURSUANT TO
FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)

Defendants.

17
18
19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Audrey Merriweather, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
20 Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant Rudolph Incorporated as to all claims
21 in this action.
22

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, in relevant part:

23

41(a) Voluntary Dismissal

24

(1) By the Plaintiff

25

(a) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(3), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any

26

applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court

27

order by filing:

28

(1) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer
1
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT RUDOLPH INCORPORATED

Case 5:15-cv-05131-EJD Document 20 Filed 02/23/16 Page 2 of 2

1
2

or a motion for summary judgment.
Defendant Rudolph Incorporated has neither answered Plaintiff’s Complaint, nor filed a

3 motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the matter may be dismissed against it, with
4 prejudice, for all purposes and without an Order of the Court.
5
6 Dated: February 23, 2016

Sagaria Law, P.C.

7
By:
8
9

/s/ Elliot W. Gale
Elliot W. Gale
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Joseph Young

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT RUDOLPH INCORPORATED