Jisser et al v. City of Palo Alto

Filing 24

ORDER GRANTING Extending Deadlines for Opposition and Reply re 23 Stipulation, filed by Toufic and Eva Jisser Revocable Trust, Eva Jisser, Toufic Jisser, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 20 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant City of Palo Alto's Notice of Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss . Response due by 1/13/2016. Reply due by 1/29/2016. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/5/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2016)

Download PDF
Case 5:15-cv-05295-EJD Document 23 Filed 12/30/15 Page 1 of 2 S R NIA A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 930 G Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 419-7111 FAX (916) 419-7747 9 PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION a E R DATED: 1/5/2016 C N F D IS T IC T O R H 8 J . D av i l FO RT d w a rd J u d ge E LI UNIT ED DERED O OR IT IS S NO 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Toufic and Eva Jisser and the Toufic and Eva Jisser Revocable Trust 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 1 LAWRENCE G. SALZMAN, No. 224727 E-mail: lsalzman@pacificlegal.org 2 J. DAVID BREEMER, No. 215039 E-mail: jdb@pacificlegal.org 3 Pacific Legal Foundation 930 G Street 4 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 419-7111 5 Facsimile: (916) 419-7747 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 TOUFIC AND EVA JISSER, AND THE TOUFIC AND EVA JISSER REVOCABLE TRUST, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 CITY OF PALO ALTO, 17 Defendant. 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 5:15-cv-05295-EJD STIPULATION EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ AND DEFENDANT’S DEADLINES TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS AND REPLY Date: May 26, 2016 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 4 Honorable Edward J. Davila, Judge 20 21 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Toufic and Eva Jisser and the Toufic and Eva Jisser Revocable Trust 22 23 (“Plaintiffs”) filed their Complaint in this action on November 19, 2015 (Dkt. 1) and served the 24 Complaint and Summons on Defendant City of Palo Alto (“City”) on or about November 23, 2015. WHEREAS, the City’s 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss was filed on December 22, 25 26 2015 (Dkt. 20). WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ opposition to the City’s motion is due January 5, 2016. 27 28 /// Stip. Extending Deadlines for Opposition and Reply—No. 5:15-cv-05295-EJD -1- Case 5:15-cv-05295-EJD Document 23 Filed 12/30/15 Page 2 of 2 1 WHEREAS, the parties are willing to stipulate to a short extension of time for Plaintiffs 2 to file an opposition to the City’s motion to dismiss and for the City to file a reply, which 3 extensions will not affect any other deadline in the case. 4 NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and the City stipulate, by and through counsel, that the 5 deadline for Plaintiffs to file an opposition to the City’s motion is extended to January 13, 2016, 6 and the City’s reply shall be due on or before January 29, 2016. 7 Dated: December 30, 2015. PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION 8 By: /s/ Lawrence G. Salzman LAWRENCE G. SALZMAN J. DAVID BREEMER Attorneys for Plaintiffs Toufic and Eva Jisser and the Toufic and Eva Jisser Revocable Trust 9 PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION 930 G Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 419-7111 FAX (916) 419-7747 10 11 12 13 DATED: December 30, 2015. BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 14 15 By: /s/ Kevin D. Siegel KEVIN D. SIEGEL Attorney for Defendant City of Palo Alto 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. Extending Deadlines for Opposition and Reply—No. 5:15-cv-05295-EJD -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?