Jones v. Unknown

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. It is hereby ordered that the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/13/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TONY RAE-HERNANDEZ JONES, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, 15 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 15-5311 RMW (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL 16 17 On November 19, 2015, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a “mental health treatment 18 plan” in this court. That same day, the Clerk notified plaintiff that he had not paid a filing fee, 19 nor had he filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Clerk also notified 20 plaintiff that he failed to submit a complaint. Along with the deficiency notices, plaintiff was 21 provided with a new IFP application and instructions for completing it. Plaintiff was further 22 cautioned that his failure to either file a completed IFP application or pay the filing fee within 23 twenty-eight days would result in the dismissal of this action. In addition, plaintiff was advised 24 that his failure to file a complaint within twenty-eight days would result in the dismissal of this 25 action. To date, plaintiff has not paid his filing fee, filed a completed IFP application, or filed a 26 complaint. 27 28 Thus, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. Order of Dismissal P:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.15\Jones311disifpcomp.wpd 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 1/13/2016 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order of Dismissal P:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.15\Jones311disifpcomp.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?