Viramontes v. United States of America
Filing
14
ORDER re 13 Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Daniel Viramontes. It is hereby ordered pursuant to execution of the settlement agreement between the parties, that the Court hereby dismisses the instant-action with prejudice. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 5/24/2016. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq., SBN 69888
BEN NISENBAUM, Esq. SBN 222173
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Center
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
John.Burris@johnburrislaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
DANIEL VIRAMONTES, individually
and as Successor-in-Interest for
Decedent JUAN CARLOS RUELAS,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
) Case No.: 5:15-cv-05393 RMW
)
) NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH
) PREJUDICE AND ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,v.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
26
27
28
DANIEL VIRAMONTES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER
1
1
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
2
Pursuant to the execution of the settlement agreement between Plaintiff DANIEL
3
VIRAMONTES and Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff DANIEL
4
VIRAMONTES hereby dismisses the instant action with prejudice.
5
6
Respectfully submitted,
The Law Offices of John L. Burris
7
8
9
Dated: May 18, 2016
10
s/ Ben Nisenbaum
Ben Nisenbaum, Esq.
11
12
ORDER
13
14
15
Pursuant to Plaintiff’s Notice of Dismissal, the Court hereby dismisses the
instant-action with prejudice. The Clerk shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
Dated: 5/24/2016
___________________________
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DANIEL VIRAMONTES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?