Acosta et al v. City of Salinas

Filing 33

Order Directing Plaintiffs to Respond to 31 Motion for Leave to File Supplementary Material. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 02/11/2016. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 RITA ACOSTA, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 15-CV-05415-LHK ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL v. CITY OF SALINAS, Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendant. 17 18 On February 11, 2016, Defendant filed an ex parte motion for leave to file supplementary 19 material. ECF No. 31. Civil Local Rule 7-10, which governs ex parte motions, provides that “a 20 party may file an ex parte motion . . . only if a statute, Federal Rule, local rule or Standing Order 21 authorizes the filing of an ex parte motion.” Civil L.R. 7-10. Moreover, the ex parte motion 22 “must include a citation to the statute, rule or order which permits the use of an ex parte motion to 23 obtain the relief sought.” Id. 24 With respect to this requirement, Defendant’s ex parte motion refers only to two Civil 25 Local Rules: Civil Local Rule 7-3(d), which governs how supplementary material may be filed, 26 and Civil Local Rule 7-11, which govern motions for administrative relief. ECF No. 31 at 1; Civil 27 28 1 Case No. 15-CV-05415-LHK ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 1 L.R. 7-3(d); Civil L.R. 7-11. Importantly, neither Civil Local Rule 7-3(d) nor Civil Local Rule 7- 2 11 “permits the use of an ex parte motion to obtain the relief sought.” Civil L.R. 7-10. 3 Accordingly, the Court shall treat Defendant’s motion not as an ex parte motion, but as a 4 motion for administrative relief. Thus, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11, the Court hereby 5 ORDERS Plaintiffs to file a response to Defendant’s motion by February 16, 2016, at 5:00 p.m. 6 See Civil L.R. 7-11(b) (“Any opposition to or support for a Motion for Administrative Relief . . . 7 must be filed no later than 4 days after the motion has been filed.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(a)(1) (“[I]n 8 computing any time period . . . count every day . . . but if the last day is a . . . legal holiday, the 9 period continues to run until the end of the next day.”). IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Dated: February 11, 2016 12 13 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 15-CV-05415-LHK ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?