Petersen-Dean Inc. v. Folk et al
Filing
48
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME RE: HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND PARTIE' CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 47 . Motion to Dismiss 33 and Case Management Conference set for 3/23/2016 01:00 PM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/22/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2016)
1 Jack Russo (Cal. Bar No. 96068)
Christopher Sargent (Cal. Bar No. 246285)
2 COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP
401 Florence Street
3 Palo Alto, CA 94301
(650) 327-9800
4 (650) 618-1863 fax
jrusso@computerlaw.com
5 csargent@computerlaw.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff
PETERSEN-DEAN, INC.
7
8
U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT
9
N ORTHERN D ISTRICT OF C ALIFORNIA
10
Computerlaw Group LLP
www.computerlaw.comsm
11
Petersen-Dean, Inc., a California
Corporation,
12
Plaintiff;
13
v.
Case No. 5:15-cv-5522-NC
STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME
RE: HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS AND PARTIES’ CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE.
14
15
16
17
18
JAJ Roofing, Inc. dba Citadel Roofing and
Solar, a California Corporation,
Dieter Folk, an individual,
Jeffrey Maxfield, an individual,
Bryce Robicheau, an individual, and
Wendi Zubillaga, an individual,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. and Order Enlarging Time
Case No. 5:15-cv-05522-NC
1
S TIPULATION E NLARGING T IME RE: D EFENDANTS ’ M OTION TO D ISMISS
2
This Stipulation is entered into by Plaintiff Petersen-Dean, Inc. and Defendants JAJ
3 Roofing Inc., Dieter Folk, Wendi Zubillaga, Bryce Robicheau, and Jeffrey Maxfield
4 (collectively, “Defendants”) by their respective counsel.
5
R ECITALS
6
A.
Plaintiff Petersen-Dean, Inc. filed its Complaint on December 2, 2015 (Dkt. 1)
7
B.
Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (the “Motion”) on
8 December 31, 2015 (Dkt. 33), set for hearing on February 24, 2016. On January 11, 2016, Parties
9 filed a Stipulation Enlarging Time (Dkt. 35), approved in an Order granted by this Court (Dkt.
10 36), moving Plaintiff’s deadline to file its Opposition to the Motion to January 28, 2016.
Computerlaw Group LLP
www.computerlaw.comsm
11
C.
Hearing for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint was set for Wednesday,
12 February 24, 2016 (Dkt. 36).
13
D.
The Case Management Conference for this case was set for March 2, 2016 (Dkt.
E.
Counsel for Plaintiff will not be available on March 2, 2016 for the Case
14 4).
15
16 Management Conference due to a family emergency.
17
18
S TIPULATION
To accommodate Counsel’s personal situation, the Parties hereby stipulate to modify the
19 briefing schedule for the Motion as follows:
20
Hearing on Motion to Dismiss Complaint:
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
21
Case Management Conference:
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
22 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP
23
24
Dated: February 22, 2016
By:
25
/s/ Jack Russo
Jack Russo
Christopher Sargent
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PETERSEN-DEAN, INC.
26
27
28
Stip. and Order Enlarging Time
1
Case No. 5:15-cv-05522-NC
SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
1
2
Dated: February 22, 2016
By:
3
/s/ John S. Worden
John S. Worden
Attorneys for Defendants
JAJ ROOFING, INC., DIETER FOLK, WENDI
ZUBILLAGA, BRYCE ROBICHEAU, AND
JEFFREY MAXFIELD.
4
5
6
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
7
I, Jack Russo, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
8 declaration. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that John S. Worden has
9 concurred in this filing’s content and has authorized this filing.
10
By:
/s/ Jack Russo
Jack Russo
12
13
17
NO
18
D
TE
GRAN
RT
19
ER
21
Cousins
A
H
20
.
thanael M
Judge Na
R NIA
Hon. Nathanael Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge
FO
16
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
LI
Dated: February 22, 2016
S
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
14
RT
U
O
Computerlaw Group LLP
www.computerlaw.comsm
11 Dated: February 22, 2016
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. and Order Enlarging Time
2
Case No. 5:15-cv-05522-NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?