Domingo R Davis v. City of Santa Clara et al

Filing 15

ORDER GRANTING 14 Stipulation Extending Time for Response filed by City of Santa Clara, Phan Cuong. Response due 4/4/2016. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/23/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2016)

Download PDF
Case 5:15-cv-05603-EJD Document 14 Filed 03/21/16 Page 1 of 2 ,91347 7 RT CITY OF SANTA CLARA and CUONG PHAN d wa J u d ge E H ER 8 rd J . D a vila DATED: 3/23/2016 N R NIA Attorneys for Defendants FO 6 4 DERED O OR IT IS S NO 5 Phone: 408.244.2166 Fax: 408.244.7815 Email: mdavis@davisvounqlaw.com Email: eric@davisvounalaw.com LI 3 S DISTRICT TE C TA A DAVIS & YOUNG,APLC 1960 The Alameda, Suite 210 San Jose, OA 95126 UNIT ED 2 S MARK E. DAVIS—BAR NO.79936 ERIC J. BENGTSON—BAR NO. 254167 RT U O 1 F D IS T IC T O R C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 DOMINGO R. DAVIS, JR., Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. Case No.: 5:15-cv.05603-EJD STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT CITY OF SANTA CLARA and CUONG PHAN, 16 Defendants, 17 18 19 The parties to this action, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 20 1. There is no trial date in this matter; 21 2. The complaint in this matter was filed on December 8, 2015. 22 3. The summons and complaint was served on Defendants City of Santa Clara and 23 24 Cuong Phan on February 29, 2016; 4. Mark E. Davis, of Davis & Young, APLC, was recently assigned as counsel for 25 Defendants City of Santa Clara and Cuong Phan and has not yet had an opportunity 26 to review the complaint and prepare a responsive pleading; 27 28 5. Mr. Davis is in trial in Santa Clara County Superior Court from March 21, 2016, until at least March 28, 2016; (91474/00285999^1 -1- Stipulation and Order Extending Deadline for Response to Complaint Case 5:15-cv-05603-EJD Document 14 Filed 03/21/16 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?