Sawatzky v. Mi Pueblo, LLC et al
Filing
30
ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 7/15/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
JULIA SAWATZKY,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 15-CV-05752-LHK
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
VACATE CASE SCHEDULE AND
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
v.
MI PUEBLO, LLC, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 29
Defendants.
17
18
On July 10, 2016, Plaintiff Julia Sawatzky (“Plaintiff”) filed a notice informing the Court
19
that the parties have settled. ECF No. 29. Plaintiff asked the Court to vacate all matters currently
20
scheduled and to permit the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal by August 30, 2016.
21
Plaintiff’s request to vacate the case schedule is DENIED. The Court will not vacate the case
22
schedule until a stipulation of dismissal is filed. However, in light of the parties’ settlement, the
23
Court CONTINUES the case management conference currently scheduled for July 27, 2016 to
24
September 7, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file a joint case management statement by
25
August 31, 2016. If the parties file a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice by August 30, 2016,
26
27
28
1
Case No. 15-CV-05752-LHK
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO VACATE CASE SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
1
the Court will vacate the case management conference.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: July 15, 2016
4
5
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 15-CV-05752-LHK
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO VACATE CASE SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?