Dantes v. Stanford Hospital and Clinics
Filing
47
Order Granting Motion to Appoint Counsel for Limited-Scope Representation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/26/16. (hrllc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2016)
E-Filed 5/26/16
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MARIE ENCAR ARNOLD DANTES,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
v.
STANFORD HEALTH CARE,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
13
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL FOR LIMITEDSCOPE REPRESENTATION
Defendant.
11
12
Case No. 15-cv-05951-HRL
Plaintiff Marie Dantes (“Dantes”) moves the court to appoint counsel for the limited
purpose of representing her at a settlement conference set for June 6, 2016.
14
Dantes asserts that: (1) she has no lawyer; (2) she lacks the financial resources necessary to
15
hire a lawyer; (3) she has “contacted approximately 30 lawyers” without “those consultations”
16
leading to representation; and (4) her case “warrants pro bono representation because an attorney
17
could help [her]” to understand her case, to negotiate at the settlement conference, and to
18
understand any proposed settlement agreement. In addition, the Staff Attorney at the Federal Pro
19
Se Program states that he consulted with Dantes and that he believes she would benefit from the
20
limited-scope representation she requests.
21
The court is satisfied, pursuant to General Order 25, that the motion should be granted as
22
follows: (1) the Federal Pro Se Program shall attempt to secure the services of a suitable volunteer
23
attorney; and (2) if a suitable volunteer is found, the court will appoint the volunteer for the
24
limited purpose of representing Dantes in the course of the upcoming settlement conference.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 5/26/16
27
28
HOWARD R. LLOYD
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?