Yale v. Wizards of the Coast LLC

Filing 47

ORDER GRANTING 46 STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/18/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 David Borgen (SBN 099354) Of Counsel dborgen@gbdhlegal.com James Kan (SBN 240749) jkan@gbdhlegal.com Katharine Fisher (SBN 305413) kfisher@gbdhlegal.com GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000 Oakland, CA 94612 Tel: (510) 763-9800 Fax: (510) 835-1417 7 8 9 10 Michael Malk (SBN 222366) mm@malklawfirm.com MICHAEL MALK, ESQ. APC 1180 S. Beverly Drive, Suite 302 Los Angeles, CA 90035 Tel: (310) 203-0016 Fax: (310) 499-5210 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class (Additional counsel listed on the next page) 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 PAUL YALE, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 18 19 vs. 20 Case No. 15-CV-06337-EJD JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WIZARDS OF THE COAST, LLC, 21 22 23 24 Defendant. Date: February 1, 2018 Time: 11:00 a.m. Ctrm: 4 – 5th Floor Before: Hon. Edward J. Davila Complaint Filed: April 12, 2016 FAC Filed: December 5, 2016 SAC Filed: September 22, 2017 Trial Date: Not set 25 26 27 28 692672.1 FPDOCS 33347387.1 JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEF’S MOT. TO DISMISS SAC CASE NO.:15-CV-06337-EJD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Matthew Righetti (SBN 121012) John Glugoski, Esq. (SBN 191551) RIGHETTI GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 983-0900 Fax: (415) 397-9005 Reuben D. Nathan (SBN 208436) NATHAN & ASSOCIATES, APC 2901 West Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 350 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Tel: (949) 263-5992 11 Ross Cornell (SBN 210413) ross.law@me.com LAW OFFICES OF ROSS CORNELL, APC 111 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 400 Long Beach, CA 90802 Tel: (562) 612-1708 Fax: (562) 394-9556 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class 9 10 13 14 15 16 Karl R. Lindegren (SBN 125914) Shaun J. Voigt (SBN 265721) FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 2050 Main Street, Suite 1000 Irvine, California 92614 Tel.: (949) 851-2424 Fax: (949) 851-0152 17 18 Attorneys for Defendant, WIZARDS OF THE COAST LLC 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 692672.1 FPDOCS 33347387.1 JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEF’S MOT. TO DISMISS SAC CASE NO.:15-CV-06337-EJD 1 Plaintiff PAUL YALE (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant WIZARDS OF THE COAST LLC 2 (“Defendant”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, submit 3 the following Joint Stipulation to Extend the Briefing Schedule on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 4 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. 5 6 WHEREAS, on September 22, 2017 Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter; 7 8 WHEREAS, on October 6, 2017 Defendant filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint; 9 10 WHEREAS, the Court set the hearing for this motion for February 1, 2018, and ordered responses be due by October 20, 2017 and replies due by November 3, 2017; 11 12 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel require an extension of one week’s time through October 27, 2017 to prepare and file their opposition to Defendant’s Motion due to other commitments of counsel; 13 WHEREAS, Defendants are amenable to Plaintiff’s request for additional time in exchange 14 for an extension of one week’s time through November 10, 2017 to prepare and file their reply in 15 connection with the Motion; 16 WHEREAS, there have been no prior extensions of the briefing schedule in connection with 17 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, and the requested extensions 18 will not prejudice either party and all other Court deadlines remain unaffected; 19 20 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their counsel of record and subject to Court approval, hereby stipulate that: 21 1. Plaintiff shall file his opposition on or before October 27, 2017; 22 2. Defendant shall file any reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second 23 Amended Complaint on or before November 10, 2017; 24 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), the e-filing attorney hereby attests that concurrence in the 25 filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories, indicated by a conformed 26 signature (/S/), which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on this e-filed document. 27 28 1 692672.1 FPDOCS 33347387.1 JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEF’S MOT. TO DISMISS SAC CASE NO.:15-CV-06337-EJD 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: October 17, 2017 GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO 3 By: 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff, PAUL YALE and the putative class 6 7 /s/ James Kan JAMES KAN Dated: October 17, 2017 8 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP By: 9 10 /s/ Shaun J. Voigt KARL R. LINDEGREN SHAUN J. VOIGT Attorneys for Defendant, WIZARDS OF THE COAST LLC 11 12 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 October 18, 2017 Dated: _____________ 16 17 By: Hon. Edward J. Davila United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 692672.1 FPDOCS 33347387.1 JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEF’S MOT. TO DISMISS SAC CASE NO.:15-CV-06337-EJD CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 3 I, the undersigned, am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; am employed with Fisher & Phillips LLP and my business address is 444 South Flower Street, Suite 1500, Los Angeles, California 90071. 4 5 6 On October 17, 2017 I served the foregoing document entitled JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT on all the appearing and/or interested parties in this action by placing the original a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows: 7 8  [by MAIL] - I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postage cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing this affidavit.  [by ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION] - I served the above listed document(s) described via the United States District Court’s Electronic Filing Program on the designated recipients via electronic transmission through the CM/ECF system on the Court’s website. The Court’s CM/ECF system will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to the filing party, the assigned judge, and any registered users in the case. The NEF will constitute service of the document(s). Registration as a CM/ECF user constitutes consent to electronic service through the court’s transmission facilities.  [by FEDERAL EXPRESS] - I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice for collection and processing of correspondence for overnight delivery by Federal Express. Under that practice such correspondence will be deposited at a facility or pick-up box regularly maintained by Federal Express for receipt on the same day in the ordinary course of business with delivery fees paid or provided for in accordance with ordinary business practices.  [by PERSONAL SERVICE] - I caused to be delivered by messenger such envelope(s) by hand to the office of the addressee(s). Such messenger is over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action and employed with Network Express, whose business address is 1533 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90017. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. 24 Executed October 17, 2017 at Los Angeles, California. 25 26 MARVIN JOHNSON By: /s/ Marvin Johnson Print Name Signature 27 28 1 692672.1 FPDOCS 33347387.1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?