LegalZoom.com, Inc. v. Rocket Lawyer, Inc.

Filing 4

Proposed Order re 1 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to Google by LegalZoom.com, Inc.. (Allan, Aaron) (Filed on 1/8/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PATRICIA L. GLASER - State Bar No. 55668 pglaser@glaserweil.com FRED D. HEATHER - State Bar No. 110650 fheather@glaserweil.com AARON P. ALLAN - State Bar No. 144406 aallan@glaserweil.com GLASER WEIL FINK HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP 10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 553-3000 Facsimile: (310) 556-2920 Attorneys for Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. a Delaware corporation, 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. Case No. CV 15 80003 NC MISC. [PROPOSED] ORDER RE LEGALZOOM’S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA TO GOOGLE ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL 983568 1 Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc’s (“LegalZoom”) Motion to Compel Compliance 2 with Subpoena to Google came on before this Court on [date]. After considering the 3 moving papers, any opposition thereto, and all supporting evidence, arguments, and 4 other matters presented, the Court GRANTS the Motion. 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Google, Inc. (“Google”) shall personally or 6 electronically serve all documents responsive to LegalZoom’s Requests to Produce 7 Documents Nos. 1-4 within thirty (30) of the issuance of this order. Alternatively, 8 Google must provide a supplemental response to each request stating that no such 9 documents exist. 10 11 12 DATED: _________________ By: _______________________________ Hon. Nathanael Cousins 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL 983568

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?