Fleming v. Colvin
Filing
7
ORDER to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 5/18/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
JONATHAN BENJAMIN FLEMING,
Case No. 16-CV-00162-LHK
13
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
14
15
16
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Defendant.
17
18
Plaintiff Jonathan Benjamin Fleming (“Plaintiff”) filed the complaint on January 11, 2016.
19
ECF No. 1. According to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, “[i]f a defendant is not served within
20
90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the
21
plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be
22
made within a specified time.” To comply with Rule 4, Plaintiff needed to serve Defendant
23
Carolyn Colvin within 90 days of January 11, 2016, or by April 11, 2016. It is now May 18, 2016
24
and Plaintiff has failed to file any proof of service. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED
25
TO SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to
26
prosecute. Plaintiff has until June 2, 2016 to file a response to this Order to Show Cause. A
27
hearing on this Order to Show Cause is set for June 16, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff’s failure to
28
1
Case No.16-CV-00162-LHK
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
1
respond to this Order and to appear at the June 16, 2016 hearing will result in dismissal without
2
prejudice for failure to prosecute.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: May 18, 2016
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.16-CV-00162-LHK
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?