Velasco et al v. City of Salinas et al

Filing 16

ORDER Requesting Joint Response. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 4/14/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 JOSE VELASCO, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 Case No. 16-CV-00172-LHK ORDER REQUESTING JOINT RESPONSE v. Re: Dkt. No. 15 15 CITY OF SALINAS, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On April 12, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to stay the instant case pending the 19 outcome of criminal charges against Plaintiff Jose Velasco. ECF No. 15. According to the 20 parties, the criminal charges arise out of the incident giving rise to the instant case. See id. In the 21 interest of managing the Court’s caseload, the Court requests that the parties instead consider 22 dismissing the instant case without prejudice, with a tolling agreement as to any claims and 23 counterclaims. By April 20, 2016, the parties are ORDERED to file a joint response indicating 24 whether the parties are amenable to such a dismissal and, if so, when such a dismissal could be 25 filed. This response may be included in the parties’ joint case management statement, which also 26 must be filed by April 20, 2016. 27 28 1 Case No. 16-CV-00172-LHK ORDER REQUESTING JOINT RESPONSE 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: April 14, 2016 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 16-CV-00172-LHK ORDER REQUESTING JOINT RESPONSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?