Yahoo! Inc. v. Kudelski SA et al

Filing 28

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION to Continue CMC and for Extension to Respond 27 . Case Management Conference set for 7/6/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. Case Management Statement due by 6/29/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/19/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DURIE TANGRI LLP DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825) ddurie@durietangri.com CLEMENT S. ROBERTS (SBN 209203) croberts@durietangri.com LAURA E. MILLER (SBN 271713) lmiller@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6666 Facsimile: 415-236-6300 Attorneys for Plaintiff YAHOO! INC. 8 9 10 11 12 13 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP MICHAEL K. PLIMACK (Bar No. 133869) mplimack@cov.com One Front Street, 35th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-5356 Telephone: 415-591-6000 Facsimile: 415-591-6091 Attorneys for Defendants KUDELSKI SA, and OPENTV, INC. 14 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 YAHOO! INC., 19 20 21 22 Case No. 5:16-cv-00349-NC Plaintiff, v. KUDELSKI SA and OPENTV, INC., STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC AND FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND UNDER L.R. 6-2 Ctrm: 7, 4th Floor Judge: Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00349-NC 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo”) and Defendants Kudelski 2 SA and OpenTV, Inc. (“OpenTV”), stipulate and request that the Court enter an order continuing the 3 Initial Case Management Conference, currently set for June 15, 2016, and permitting Yahoo an extension 4 until June 30, 2016 to file its responsive pleading to OpenTV’s counterclaims. Yahoo’s responsive 5 pleading deadline, currently set for May 19, 2016, has been modified twice by stipulation and Court 6 order. Dkt. Nos. 23–26. The Court has not yet entered a schedule setting any deadlines beyond the 7 Initial Case Management Conference. The parties have reached a settlement agreement resolving the 8 claims in this litigation and anticipate filing a stipulated dismissal in due course. 9 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to approval of the Court, that the Initial 10 Case Management Conference is continued and Yahoo may file its responsive pleading on June 30, 2016. 11 Dated: May 19, 2016 DURIE TANGRI LLP 12 /s/ Laura E. Miller LAURA E. MILLER By: 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff YAHOO! INC. 15 16 17 Dated: May 19, 2016 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP /s/ Michael K. Plimack MICHAEL K. PLIMACK By: 18 Attorneys for Defendants KUDELSKI SA and OPENTV, INC. 19 20 21 22 23 24 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Laura E. Miller attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. /s/ Laura E. Miller LAURA E. MILLER 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00349-NC HONORABLE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS S DISTRICT TE Magistrate Judge United States C A 3 S UNIT ED T 6 GRAN NO 5 . thanael M Judge Na TED RT ER 10 11 A H 9 Cousins LI 7 8 RT U O 4 R NIA 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that the forgoing Agreement is approved. Case Management Conference is continued to July 6, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. CMC statement due June 29, 2016 Dated: ___________________ _____________________________________________ May 19, 2016 FO 1 N D IS T IC T R OF C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00349-NC 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 19, 2016 the within document was filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to the attorneys of record in this case. 4 /s/ Laura E. Miller LAURA E. MILLER 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00349-NC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?