Ryan Corley et al v. Google, Inc.
Filing
126
Order Regarding Status of Individual Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 08/08/2016. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
RYAN CORLEY, et al.,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
ORDER REGARDING STATUS OF
INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS
v.
15
Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK
GOOGLE, INC.,
16
Defendant.
17
18
For purposes of ruling on Defendant’s motion to sever, the Court requests that the parties
19
provide additional information concerning the individual Plaintiffs in the instant case and in the
20
related case, Amaral v. Google Inc. (16-CV-2553) (N.D. Cal.).
21
22
23
Specifically, the Court ORDERS the parties to file a statement by August 11, 2016 which
specifies:
and Amaral cases had Google Apps for Education email accounts.
24
25
The name of every educational institution where the individual Plaintiffs in the Corley
How many individual Plaintiffs remain in the Corley and Amaral cases. This number
26
shall exclude all individual Plaintiffs who have been voluntarily dismissed. The parties
27
shall provide both (1) the total number of Plaintiffs in aggregate, and (2) the total
28
1
Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK
ORDER REGARDING STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS
number of Plaintiffs by educational institution.
1
2
3
The names and educational institution of every individual Plaintiff who has been
voluntarily dismissed from the Corley and Amaral cases.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated: August 8, 2016
6
7
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK
ORDER REGARDING STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?