Ryan Corley et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 126

Order Regarding Status of Individual Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 08/08/2016. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 RYAN CORLEY, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 ORDER REGARDING STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS v. 15 Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK GOOGLE, INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 For purposes of ruling on Defendant’s motion to sever, the Court requests that the parties 19 provide additional information concerning the individual Plaintiffs in the instant case and in the 20 related case, Amaral v. Google Inc. (16-CV-2553) (N.D. Cal.). 21 22 23 Specifically, the Court ORDERS the parties to file a statement by August 11, 2016 which specifies:  and Amaral cases had Google Apps for Education email accounts. 24 25 The name of every educational institution where the individual Plaintiffs in the Corley  How many individual Plaintiffs remain in the Corley and Amaral cases. This number 26 shall exclude all individual Plaintiffs who have been voluntarily dismissed. The parties 27 shall provide both (1) the total number of Plaintiffs in aggregate, and (2) the total 28 1 Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK ORDER REGARDING STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS number of Plaintiffs by educational institution. 1 2 3  The names and educational institution of every individual Plaintiff who has been voluntarily dismissed from the Corley and Amaral cases. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: August 8, 2016 6 7 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK ORDER REGARDING STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?