Ryan Corley et al v. Google, Inc.
Filing
69
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 4/20/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
RYAN CORLEY, et al.,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
v.
15
Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK
GOOGLE, INC.,
16
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
Plaintiffs’ Attorney: Ray Gallo
Defendant’s Attorneys: Michael Rhodes, Kyle Wong
An initial case management conference was held on April 20, 2016. A further case
management conference is set for April 28, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. The parties need not file an
updated joint case management statement.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
By Monday, April 25, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., Plaintiffs shall file a brief discussing the
propriety of mass joinder. By Tuesday, April 26, 2016, at 8:00 p.m., Defendant shall file a
response brief. Briefs shall be no longer than 10 pages each.
The Court proposed that the parties stipulate to a tolling agreement, withdrawal of the First
Amended Complaint, severance of the 710 individual plaintiffs, and/or a schedule for motions to
narrow issues and possibly the number of plaintiffs in the case. The parties shall include their
response to the Court’s proposal in the above briefs.
The parties shall file a proposed protective order for Judge Grewal’s signature by May 4,
1
Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
2
3
2016.
The parties shall exchange initial disclosures by May 6, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: April 20, 2016
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?