Ryan Corley et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 69

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 4/20/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 RYAN CORLEY, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER v. 15 Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK GOOGLE, INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 Plaintiffs’ Attorney: Ray Gallo Defendant’s Attorneys: Michael Rhodes, Kyle Wong An initial case management conference was held on April 20, 2016. A further case management conference is set for April 28, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. The parties need not file an updated joint case management statement. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By Monday, April 25, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., Plaintiffs shall file a brief discussing the propriety of mass joinder. By Tuesday, April 26, 2016, at 8:00 p.m., Defendant shall file a response brief. Briefs shall be no longer than 10 pages each. The Court proposed that the parties stipulate to a tolling agreement, withdrawal of the First Amended Complaint, severance of the 710 individual plaintiffs, and/or a schedule for motions to narrow issues and possibly the number of plaintiffs in the case. The parties shall include their response to the Court’s proposal in the above briefs. The parties shall file a proposed protective order for Judge Grewal’s signature by May 4, 1 Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 2 3 2016. The parties shall exchange initial disclosures by May 6, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: April 20, 2016 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 16-CV-00473-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?