Pelayo et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 20

MODIFIED ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY LITIGATION 19 . Hearing on Motion to Dismiss 16 set for 6/22/2016 01:00 PM. Opposition due by 5/25/2016. Reply due by 6/8/2016. Case Management Statement due by 7/20/2016. Case Management Conference set for 7/27/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 3/28/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

CONSUMER LITIGATION LAW CENTER, APC

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. dba WELLS )
)
FARGO HOME MORTGAGE; and all
)
persons or entities unknown claiming any
)
legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien or
)
interest in the property described in this
)
complaint adverse to Plaintiffs’ title thereto; )
)
and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
))
)
_____________________________________ )
)
ANGELA PELAYO and THEODORE
CARLO,

Case No.: 5:16-CV-00648-NC
MODIFIED
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT
STIPULATION TO STAY LITIGATION
UNTIL JUNE 20, 2016

25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO STAY LITIGATION

1

Pursuant to the concurrently-filed Stipulation of the Parties, the Court Orders as follows:

2

1. The hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint is

3
4
5
6
7

continued from April 20, 2016 to June 22, 2016.
2. Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be filed by May 25, 2016 and Reply
papers by June 8, 2016.
27
3. The Case Management Conference is continued from May 11, 2016 to July 20,
20
2016, with a Joint Case Management Statement due by July 13, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

10

S

__ _________________________________
RED
Honorable SO ORDM. Cousins
Nathaniel E
IT IS
Magistrate JudgeDIFIED
O

15

18

ER

Cousins

H

17

RT

16

.
hanael M
udge Nat
J

FO

14

R NIA

AS M

LI

13

28
Dated: March _____, 2016

UNIT
ED

12

RT
U
O

11

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

9

NO

CONSUMER LITIGATION LAW CENTER, APC

8

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO STAY LITIGATION