Wells Fargo v Aaron
Filing
6
ORDER re Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/29/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 16-CV-00802-LHK
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL
v.
Re: Dkt. No. 5
WANDA MAXINE AARON,
Defendant.
17
18
On February 24, 2016, the parties informed the Court that the parties had reached a
19
settlement in the instant case and in the related case of Aaron v. Experian Information Solutions,
20
Inc., et al. (“Experian”), No. 15-CV-02951-LHK. ECF No. 5. On February 25, 2016, the parties
21
filed a stipulation in Experian that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) “be
22
dismissed from this action with prejudice.” ECF No. 73 in the Experian docket. That same day,
23
the Court granted the stipulation and dismissed Wells Fargo from Experian. ECF No. 74 in the
24
Experian docket. The parties have not filed a stipulation of dismissal in the instant case. The
25
Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal in the instant case by March 7,
26
2016, if the parties have settled.
27
28
1
Case No. 16-CV-00802-LHK
ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: February 29, 2016
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 16-CV-00802-LHK
ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?