Wells Fargo v Aaron

Filing 6

ORDER re Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/29/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 13 14 15 16 Case No. 16-CV-00802-LHK Plaintiff, ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL v. Re: Dkt. No. 5 WANDA MAXINE AARON, Defendant. 17 18 On February 24, 2016, the parties informed the Court that the parties had reached a 19 settlement in the instant case and in the related case of Aaron v. Experian Information Solutions, 20 Inc., et al. (“Experian”), No. 15-CV-02951-LHK. ECF No. 5. On February 25, 2016, the parties 21 filed a stipulation in Experian that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) “be 22 dismissed from this action with prejudice.” ECF No. 73 in the Experian docket. That same day, 23 the Court granted the stipulation and dismissed Wells Fargo from Experian. ECF No. 74 in the 24 Experian docket. The parties have not filed a stipulation of dismissal in the instant case. The 25 Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal in the instant case by March 7, 26 2016, if the parties have settled. 27 28 1 Case No. 16-CV-00802-LHK ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: February 29, 2016 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 16-CV-00802-LHK ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?