Lifshitz v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filing 20

ORDER GRANTING 19 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Ehud Lifshitz. The Clerk shall close this file. ***ALL Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/26/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2016)

Download PDF
S RT 6 Ju a rd J . d ge E d w 8 D av i l a E R DATED: 5/26/2016 C N F D IS T IC T O R H 7 R NIA Attorneys for Plaintiff EHUD LIFSHITZ FO 5 LI 4 DERED O OR IT IS S 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 A 3 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 2 DANIEL PARKER JETT, CA Bar No. 178070 daniel.jett@jettlaw.com THE JETT LAW FIRM, APC 2596 Mission Street, Suite 200 San Marino, California 91108 Telephone: (626) 399-0857 Facsimile: (626) 628-3986 NO 1 UNIT ED Case 5:16-cv-00930-EJD Document 19 Filed 05/24/16 Page 1 of 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 EHUD LIFSHITZ, an individual, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 vs. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation, Defendants. Case No. 5:16-CV-00930 EJD NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)] Complaint filed: February 24, 2016 Trial Date: None set Case Management Conf: June 30, 3016 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case 5:16-cv-00930-EJD Document 19 Filed 05/24/16 Page 2 of 2 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 3 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff EHUD LIFSHITZ (“Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses without prejudice the 4 above captioned action, which was originally filed on February 24, 2016, based on the First 5 Amended Complaint, filed herein on May 4, 2016. 6 7 The Clerk shall close this file. DATED: May 23, 2016 THE JETT LAW FIRM, APC 8 9 10 11 By: /s/ Daniel Parker Jett Attorneys for Plaintiff EHUD LIFSHITZ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?