Lifshitz v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING 19 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Ehud Lifshitz. The Clerk shall close this file. ***ALL Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/26/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2016)
S
RT
6
Ju
a rd J .
d ge E d w
8
D av i l a
E R DATED: 5/26/2016 C
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
H
7
R NIA
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EHUD LIFSHITZ
FO
5
LI
4
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
A
3
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
2
DANIEL PARKER JETT, CA Bar No. 178070
daniel.jett@jettlaw.com
THE JETT LAW FIRM, APC
2596 Mission Street, Suite 200
San Marino, California 91108
Telephone:
(626) 399-0857
Facsimile:
(626) 628-3986
NO
1
UNIT
ED
Case 5:16-cv-00930-EJD Document 19 Filed 05/24/16 Page 1 of 2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
EHUD LIFSHITZ, an individual,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
vs.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California
corporation,
Defendants.
Case No. 5:16-CV-00930 EJD
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
[Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)]
Complaint filed: February 24, 2016
Trial Date: None set
Case Management Conf: June 30, 3016
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Case 5:16-cv-00930-EJD Document 19 Filed 05/24/16 Page 2 of 2
1
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule
3
41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff EHUD LIFSHITZ (“Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses without prejudice the
4
above captioned action, which was originally filed on February 24, 2016, based on the First
5
Amended Complaint, filed herein on May 4, 2016.
6
7
The Clerk shall close this file.
DATED: May 23, 2016
THE JETT LAW FIRM, APC
8
9
10
11
By: /s/
Daniel Parker Jett
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EHUD LIFSHITZ
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?