Pajas et al v. County of Monterey et al
Filing
116
ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF (In Re: ECF No. 112 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen on 3/6/2017. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MARK VASQUEZ PAJAS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No.16-cv-00945-BLF (SVK)
ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY
LETTER BRIEF
v.
COUNTY OF MONTEREY, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 112
Defendants.
The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions and remarkably similar proposed orders.
13
The ESI requests that are the subject of dispute were served on or about December 23rd, 2016.
14
The parties have had over two months to address these disputes, during which time the Court has
15
made it clear that there would be no further extensions of the close of discovery. (Dkt. Nos. 83,
16
98.) Therefore, to the extent the parties’ submissions are intended to be a request to formally
17
extend the time for discovery, such request is DENIED.
18
The Court orders the parties to continue their meet and confer efforts to narrow the scope
19
of the ESI requests, particularly in light of the Court’s narrowing of the requests as to other
20
defendants, and to complete the production in a timely manner. The parties may, by mutual
21
agreement, conduct specific depositions after the close of discovery provided there is no adverse
22
impact on the Court-ordered schedule.
23
24
SO ORDERED.
Dated: 3/6/2017
25
26
27
28
SUSAN VAN KEULEN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?