Pajas et al v. County of Monterey et al
Filing
53
ORDER REGARDING KING CITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on June 22, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
MARK VASQUEZ PAJAS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
Case No. 16-CV-00945-LHK
ORDER REGARDING KING CITY'S
MOTION TO DISMISS
v.
COUNTY OF MONTEREY, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
In the Motion to Dismiss filed by King City, the King City Police Department, King City
19
Police Chief Tony Sollecito, and Officer Steve Orozco (collectively, the “King City Defendants”),
20
the King City Defendants assert that Tony Sollecito was not the King City Police Chief on January
21
19-20, 2015. ECF No. 32. In the Declaration of Cindy Pánuco in support of Plaintiffs’
22
Opposition to the King City Motion to Dismiss, Ms. Pánuco represents that Plaintiffs were
23
“amenable to dismissing Sollecito after confirming who was, in fact Chief on January 19.” ECF
24
No. 36-1 ¶ 5.
25
By Friday, June 24, 2016, the King City Defendants shall file an affidavit under penalty of
26
perjury identifying who was the Chief of the King City Police Department on January 19-20,
27
2015. If dismissal of Tony Sollecito is appropriate in light of the King City Defendants’ affidavit,
28
1
Case No. 16-CV-00945-LHK
ORDER REGARDING KING CITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS
1
Plaintiffs shall file a stipulation of dismissal of Tony Sollecito by Tuesday, June 28, 2016.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
6
Dated: June 22, 2016
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 16-CV-00945-LHK
ORDER REGARDING KING CITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?