Pajas et al v. County of Monterey et al

Filing 53

ORDER REGARDING KING CITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on June 22, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 MARK VASQUEZ PAJAS, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 Case No. 16-CV-00945-LHK ORDER REGARDING KING CITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS v. COUNTY OF MONTEREY, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 In the Motion to Dismiss filed by King City, the King City Police Department, King City 19 Police Chief Tony Sollecito, and Officer Steve Orozco (collectively, the “King City Defendants”), 20 the King City Defendants assert that Tony Sollecito was not the King City Police Chief on January 21 19-20, 2015. ECF No. 32. In the Declaration of Cindy Pánuco in support of Plaintiffs’ 22 Opposition to the King City Motion to Dismiss, Ms. Pánuco represents that Plaintiffs were 23 “amenable to dismissing Sollecito after confirming who was, in fact Chief on January 19.” ECF 24 No. 36-1 ¶ 5. 25 By Friday, June 24, 2016, the King City Defendants shall file an affidavit under penalty of 26 perjury identifying who was the Chief of the King City Police Department on January 19-20, 27 2015. If dismissal of Tony Sollecito is appropriate in light of the King City Defendants’ affidavit, 28 1 Case No. 16-CV-00945-LHK ORDER REGARDING KING CITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS 1 Plaintiffs shall file a stipulation of dismissal of Tony Sollecito by Tuesday, June 28, 2016. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 6 Dated: June 22, 2016 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 16-CV-00945-LHK ORDER REGARDING KING CITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?