Goldstein et al v. Weeks Street, LLC et al

Filing 4

ORDER REGARDING 3 BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 3/15/2016. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2016)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

SAN JOSE DIVISION

5
GOLDSTEIN,

6

Case No. 16-cv-01066-BLF
Plaintiff,

7
v.

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

8
WEEKS STREET, LLC,

9

[Re: ECF 3]

Defendant.
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
On March 2, 2016, the Clerk issued an initial case management scheduling order which

12
13

indicated appellant’s opening brief was due 28 days after entry of the appeal on the District

14

Court’s docket. ECF 2. On March 14, 2016, Appellant William Kennedy filed a letter seeking

15

clarification regarding the briefing schedule for this appeal. ECF 3.
Accordingly, the Court clarifies the briefing schedule. This order supersedes all prior

16
17

scheduling orders. Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8016, 8018, and B.L.R. 8018-1, the “appellant

18

must serve and file a brief [not exceeding 25 pages in length]1 within 30 days after the docketing

19

of notice that the record has been transmitted or is available electronically.” See also Fed. R.

20

Bankr. P. 8018(a)(1). The appellee must serve and file a brief not exceeding 25 pages in length

21

within 30 days after service of the appellant’s brief. Id. at 8018(a)(2). The appellant may serve

22

and file a reply brief not exceeding 15 pages in length within 14 days after service of the

23

appellee’s brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: March 15, 2016
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN

26
27
28

1

The Court is modifying the page limits set forth at Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8015(a)(7).

1

United States District Judge

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2