Soto v. City of Salinas et al

Filing 57

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/7/2017. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114)
JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268)
T. KENNEDY HELM (State Bar No. 282319)
MAYA SORENSEN (State Bar No. 250722)
HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP
505 Seventeenth Street
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FERNANDO T. SOTO

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
FERNANDO T. SOTO, Individually,
12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.

19

CITY OF SALINAS, a public entity,
SALINAS CHIEF OF POLICE KELLY
MCMILLIN, in his individual and official
capacities, SALINAS POLICE
OFFICERS CARLO CALUPAD,
GABRIEL GONZALEZ, SERGEANT
EULALIO VILLEGAS, JR., and DOES 1
through 10, individually, jointly and
severally,

20

Defendants.

15
16
17
18

21

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 5:16-cv-01139-NC
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND ORDER

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:16-cv-01139: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE & ORDER

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through their respective undersigned

2

counsel, that pursuant to the settlement between the parties in this matter, the above-captioned

3

action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, all parties to bear their own attorneys’ fees and

4

costs.

5

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

6
7
8
9

DATED: February 7, 2017

HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP

10

/s/ T. Kennedy Helm

11

T. KENNEDY HELM
Attorneys for Plaintiff FERNANDO T. SOTO

12
13

DATED: February 7, 2017

LAW OFFICES OF VINCENT P. HURLEY

14
15
16
17
18

/s/ Vincent P. Hurley*
VINCENT P. HURLEY
Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SALINAS,
SALINAS POLICE CHIEF KELLY MCMILLIN,
OFFICER CARLO CALUPAD, OFFICER
GABRIEL GONZALEZ, and SERGEANT
EULALIO VILLEGAS, JR.

19
20

*Mr. Hurley provided his consent that this document be electronically filed.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:16-cv-01139: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE & ORDER

1

1
2

ORDER
Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

3

ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint and action herein is dismissed in full and with prejudice in

4

its entirety as to all defendants, all parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

D

9

13

ER

. Cousins

LI

thanael M
Judge Na

A

H

12

RT

11

NO

10

R NIA

Hon. Nathanael NTE
GRA Cousins
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FO

8

Dated: February 7, 2017

UNIT
ED

7

RT
U
O

6

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:16-cv-01139: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE & ORDER

2