PersonalWeb Technologies LLC et al v. International Business Machines Corporation

Filing 242

ORDER GRANTING 229 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/9/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Kenneth R. Adamo (pro hac vice) kradamo@kirkland.com Brent P. Ray (pro hac vice) brent.ray@kirkland.com Elizabeth A. Cutri (pro hac vice) elizabeth.cutri@kirkland.com Ryan M. Hubbard (pro hac vice) ryan.hubbard@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 N. LaSalle Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: (312) 862-2000 Facsimile: (312) 862-2200 Lien Dang (SBN 254221) lien.dang@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 3330 Hillview Ave. Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 859-7000 Facsimile: (650) 859-7500 Attorneys for Defendant IBM 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 15 16 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC AND LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Plaintiffs, 17 18 v. 19 Case No. 5:16-cv-1266-EJD (NC) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IBM’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER SEAL INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER SEAL 5:16-cv-1266-EJD (NC) 1 Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) filed 2 an Administrative Motion to File Under Seal a Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss on March 17, 2017. 3 Defendants have moved to file under seal portions or in their entirety the Reply in Support of the 4 Motion to Dismiss (“the Reply”) as well as Exhibits A and B to the Reply, as set forth in the table 5 below. The Reply and exhibits discuss or contain confidential business information designated in 6 accordance with Protective Orders applicable in this or other litigation filed by PersonalWeb. 7 Accordingly, the Court grants Defendants’ Administrative Motion as follows: 8 9 Court’s Order Sections of Reply to be Sealed Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss: page i, line 10; page Granted 10 1, lines 5, 8, 13–16, 20; page 8, line 16; page 8m lines 1–7, 11 12, 14, 16, 19–20; page 10, lines 1, 3–11, 20–23; page 11, 12 lines 1–2 — contains IBM and third party confidential 13 business information 14 Exhibit A — contains confidential business information as 15 designated and previously sealed by PersonalWeb in other 16 litigation 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Granted Granted Exhibit B: page 1, lines 18–21; page 2, lines 2–3, 5–8, 10; page 4, lines 5–23 and 25; page 5; page 6, lines 1–17, 19– 22; page 7, lines 5–22; page 9, lines 1–22, 24–26; page 10, lines 2–5, 9–22; page 11, lines 8–11, 21–24; page 12, lines 1–16 — contains confidential business information as designated and previously sealed by PersonalWeb in other litigation 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER SEAL 2 5:16-cv-1266-EJD (NC) 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 May 9 DATED: _______________________, 2017 4 The Honorable Edward J. Davila 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER SEAL 3 5:16-cv-1266-EJD (NC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?