PersonalWeb Technologies LLC et al v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filing
242
ORDER GRANTING 229 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/9/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Kenneth R. Adamo (pro hac vice)
kradamo@kirkland.com
Brent P. Ray (pro hac vice)
brent.ray@kirkland.com
Elizabeth A. Cutri (pro hac vice)
elizabeth.cutri@kirkland.com
Ryan M. Hubbard (pro hac vice)
ryan.hubbard@kirkland.com
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
300 N. LaSalle
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: (312) 862-2000
Facsimile: (312) 862-2200
Lien Dang (SBN 254221)
lien.dang@kirkland.com
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
3330 Hillview Ave.
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: (650) 859-7000
Facsimile: (650) 859-7500
Attorneys for Defendant IBM
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
15
16
PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC AND
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
17
18
v.
19
Case No. 5:16-cv-1266-EJD (NC)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IBM’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
DISMISS UNDER SEAL
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
CORPORATION,
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
DISMISS UNDER SEAL
5:16-cv-1266-EJD (NC)
1
Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) filed
2
an Administrative Motion to File Under Seal a Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss on March 17, 2017.
3
Defendants have moved to file under seal portions or in their entirety the Reply in Support of the
4
Motion to Dismiss (“the Reply”) as well as Exhibits A and B to the Reply, as set forth in the table
5
below. The Reply and exhibits discuss or contain confidential business information designated in
6
accordance with Protective Orders applicable in this or other litigation filed by PersonalWeb.
7
Accordingly, the Court grants Defendants’ Administrative Motion as follows:
8
9
Court’s Order
Sections of Reply to be Sealed
Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss: page i, line 10; page Granted
10
1, lines 5, 8, 13–16, 20; page 8, line 16; page 8m lines 1–7,
11
12, 14, 16, 19–20; page 10, lines 1, 3–11, 20–23; page 11,
12
lines 1–2 — contains IBM and third party confidential
13
business information
14
Exhibit A — contains confidential business information as
15
designated and previously sealed by PersonalWeb in other
16
litigation
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Granted
Granted
Exhibit B: page 1, lines 18–21; page 2, lines 2–3, 5–8, 10;
page 4, lines 5–23 and 25; page 5; page 6, lines 1–17, 19–
22; page 7, lines 5–22; page 9, lines 1–22, 24–26; page 10,
lines 2–5, 9–22; page 11, lines 8–11, 21–24; page 12, lines
1–16 — contains confidential business information as
designated and previously sealed by PersonalWeb in other
litigation
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
DISMISS UNDER SEAL
2
5:16-cv-1266-EJD (NC)
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
May 9
DATED: _______________________, 2017
4
The Honorable Edward J. Davila
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
DISMISS UNDER SEAL
3
5:16-cv-1266-EJD (NC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?