George Arias v. Client Services, Inc.

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING 13 Stipulation re 12 Stipulation, 1 Complaint, TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (CIVIL L.R. 6-1) filed by Client Services, Inc. Response due 5/23/2016. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/17/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2016)

Download PDF
Case 5:16-cv-01364-EJD Document 13 Filed 05/13/16 Page 1 of 3 1 Fred W. Schwinn (SBN 225575) Raeon R. Roulston (SBN 255622) 2 Matthew C. Salmonsen (SBN 302854) CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC. 3 12 South First Street, Suite 1014 11 12 R NIA J . D av i l a LI d w a rd J u d ge E FO S I E R DATED: 5/17/2016 C N F D IS T IC T O R H 10 RT 9 ERED ORD T IS SO NO 8 David J. Kaminski (SBN 128509) Kaminskid@cmtlaw.com Shawn S. Eldridge (SBN 276581) Eldridges@cmtlaw.com CARLSON & MESSER LLP 5959 W. Century Blvd., Suite 1214 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Telephone: (310) 242-2200 Facsimile: (310) 242-2222 Attorneys for Defendant, CLIENT SERVICES, INC. A 7 UNIT ED 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O San Jose, California 95113-2418 4 Telephone: (408) 294-6100 5 Facsimile: (408) 294-6190 Attorneys for Plaintiff, GEORGE ARIAS 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 15 16 GEORGE ARIAS, 17 Case No. 5:16-cv-01364-EJD Plaintiff, 18 19 vs. 20 21 CLIENT SERVICES, INC., a Missouri corporation, SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (CIVIL L.R. 6-1) Complaint Served: April 11, 2016 Current Response Due: May 15, 2016 New Response Deadline: May 23, 2016 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Plaintiff GEORGE 26 ARIAS (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant CLIENT SERVICES, INC. (“Defendant”), and 27 through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 28 {00048822;1} 1 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME CASE NO. No. 5:16-cv-01364-EJD Case 5:16-cv-01364-EJD Document 13 Filed 05/13/16 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, Plaintiff served its complaint commencing this action on April 11, 1 2 2016; 3 WHEREAS, a Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond was filed on April 25, 2016, 4 extending the deadline for Defendant to respond to May 15, 2016 [Docket No. 12]; 5 6 WHEREAS, the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint was May 15, 2016; 7 WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agreed to extend the deadline 8 9 for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint to May 23, 2016; 10 WHEREAS, the parties hereby stipulate as follows: 11 12 13 14 That Defendant shall have an extension of time up to and including May 23, 2016 within which to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. This request does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order pursuant to Civil L.R. 6.1. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC. 17 18 Dated: May 13, 2016 19 20 21 22 /s/Fred Schwinn Fred W. Schwinn Raeon R. Roulston Matthew C. Salmonsen Attorneys for Plaintiff, GEORGE ARIAS CARLSON & MESSER LLP 23 24 Dated: May 13, 2016 25 26 27 /s/ Shawn S. Eldridge David J. Kaminski Shawn S. Eldridge Attorneys for Defendant, CLIENT SERVICES, INC. 28 {00048822;1} 2 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME CASE NO. No. 5:16-cv-01364-EJD Case 5:16-cv-01364-EJD Document 13 Filed 05/13/16 Page 3 of 3 1 ATTESTATION AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, Shawn S. Eldridge, am the ECF user whose identification and password are 3 being used to file the Stipulation Extending Defendant’s Time to Respond to Complaint, 4 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all counsel whose electronic 5 signatures in the Stipulation Extending Defendant’s Time to Respond to Complaint 6 provided their authority and concurrence to file that document. 7 8 CARLSON & MESSER LLP 9 10 Dated: May 13, 2016 11 12 /s/ Shawn S. Eldridge Shawn S. Eldridge Attorney for Defendant, CLIENT SERVICES, INC. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {00048822;1} 3 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME CASE NO. No. 5:16-cv-01364-EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?