Razavi v. Bendorf Drive Apartments et al
Filing
28
ORDER STRIKING 25 , 26 REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 1/13/2017. (blflc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2017)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN JOSE DIVISION
4
5
MELINA RAZAVI,
Case No. 16-cv-01388-BLF
Plaintiff,
6
v.
ORDER STRIKING REQUESTS FOR
JUDICIAL NOTICE
7
8
BENDORF DR. APTS., et al.,
Defendants.
9
10
On January 12, 2017, Defendants Santa Clara County Housing Authority and Bendorf Dr.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Apartments filed two requests for judicial notice of Plaintiff Melina Razavi’s vexatious litigant
12
status. ECF 25, 26. These two requests are identical to a prior request for judicial notice that the
13
Court has already struck. ECF 23, 24. In these requests for judicial notice, Defendants also
14
request that the proceedings be stayed pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section
15
391.7(c). However, section 391.7(c) is a state statute designed to protect California state courts
16
from vexatious litigation and does not apply to federal court proceedings in this District. See
17
Donovan v. City of Dallas, 377 U.S. 408, 412 (1964); Johnson v. Univ. Hous., No. 2:06-628, 2007
18
WL 4303728, at *12 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 10, 2007). The Court thus DENIES the request to stay the
19
action on this basis.
20
The Court further DENIES the requests for judicial notice because they were not filed with
21
an underlying motion or a request for relief. The notices filed thus have no force or effect here. If
22
Defendants seek to stay this action or an order declaring Plaintiff a vexatious litigant, Defendants
23
need to file a noticed motion in accordance with Civ. L.R. 7-2.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 13, 2017
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?