Huynh v. Bracamontes et al

Filing 20

Order Granting Stipulated Request to Continue Deadline for Site Inspection. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/13/16. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2016)

1
2
3

4

5
6

Albie B. Jachimowicz (SBN 104549)
Braid Pezzaglia (SBN 195378)
JACHIMOWICZ POINTER
2007 West Hedding Street, Suite 100
San Jose, California 95128
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

I

E-Filed 7/13/16

Attorneys for Defendants
Celia Bracamontes and Santiago Martinez

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11

TINA HUYNH
Plaintiff,

12
13

Case Number: 5:16-cv-01457 HRL
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE
TO CONDUCT THE JOINT SITE
INSPECTION REQUIRED UNDER GENERAL
ORDER 56 AND THE SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Vs.

14

15
16
17
18

CELIA BRACAMONTES, individually ))
and dba PRISCILLA'S SALA DE
Judge: Hon. Howard R. Lloyd
BELLEZA; SANTIAGO A. MARTINEZ
Courtroom: 2, 5th Fl., 280 S. First St., San Jose

l

Defendants.

)

____________________!
Whereas this action was commenced on March 24, 2016;
Whereas the Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under
Americans With Disabilities ActTitle II & III (42 U.S.C. §§12131-89) (Dkt. 4) sets the last date

24
25
26
27

28

for the parties and counsel to hold a joint inspection of the subject premises as July 7, 2016
(General Order 56 ~3,4);
Whereas there is a pending motion by defendants to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to
F.R.C.P. §12(b)(1) and (b)(6) scheduled for hearing on July 12,2016 (Dkt. 16);
1
Stipulation and Order (5:16-CV-01457 HRL)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Whereas the granting of the motion without leave to amend will be dispositive to this action;
Whereas the parties are making effort to conserve time and expense including attorney fees
relating to the joint inspection should the motion be granted;
Whereas the parties desire to extend the last day for the joint inspection to accommodate the
Court's ruling;
Whereas there have been no previous extensions of time requested;
The parties hereby stipulate, by and through counsel, to a 45 day continuance from which to

9

hold the joint inspection, up to and including August 22, 2016, and that all other dates in the

10

Scheduling Order triggered by the date of the site inspection also be continued accordingly.

11
12

Dated July 6, 2016

By:

/S/
Tanya Moore, Esq.
MOORE LAW FIRM
Attorney for Plaintiff
Tina Huynh

Dated July 6, 2016

By:

/S/
Braid Pezzaglia
JACHIMOWICZ POINTER
Attorneys for Defendants
CELIA BRACAMONTES et al.

13
14
15
16
17

I

18

"'
....
"
z
s

00

.... "'
"'~
>=l

If)

"' "'

r)1 ~

c.. ~ ~
l"l

~ ~
Q

-

19
20
21

~ ~ ~

" ~. [;].
-

6:tu 22
0

:::

t-

:;

~ ~

Uo"'
<J]

ORDER
Good cause showing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 4) issued on

23

this action is amended as follows: The last day for the parties and counsel to hold a joint inspection

24

of premises shall be August 22, 2016. All other dates triggered by the date of the joint site

:!

inspection shall be continued accordingly.
13
Dated July_, 2016

Hon. Howard R. Lloyd
Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of
California, for the United States District Court

27
28
2
Stipulation and Order (5: 16-CV-01457 HRL)