Johnson v. Taormino et al

Filing 25

Order to Show Cause Why Answer Should Not Be Stricken signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/13/2016. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/22/2016 at 10:00 AM, Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, San Jose. Show Cause Response due by 11/15/2016. (hrllc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2016)

Download PDF
E-filed 10/13/2016 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ANSWER SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN MILTON P. TAORMINO, et al., Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No.16-cv-01491-HRL 12 On September 19, 2016, the Court issued an order instructing the parties to complete a 13 joint inspection by October 7, 2016. The order stated: “[i]f the parties fail to comply with this 14 order, the court may issue an order to show cause why the defendants’ answer should not be 15 stricken.” Dkt. No. 23. 16 The plaintiff has informed the court that he has attempted to schedule a joint site inspection 17 but has received no response from the defendants. As a result, the court hereby orders the 18 defendants to show cause, if any, why their answer should not be stricken for failure to comply 19 with General Order 56. The parties shall appear at a show cause hearing on November 22, 2016, 20 at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California. The 21 defendants shall file a statement in response to this order to show cause no later than November 22 15, 2016. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/13/2016 25 26 27 28 HOWARD R. LLOYD United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?