Johnson v. Taormino et al

Filing 25

Order to Show Cause Why Answer Should Not Be Stricken signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/13/2016. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/22/2016 at 10:00 AM, Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, San Jose. Show Cause Response due by 11/15/2016. (hrllc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2016)

E-filed 10/13/2016

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SCOTT JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,

8
v.

9
10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
ANSWER SHOULD NOT BE
STRICKEN

MILTON P. TAORMINO, et al.,
Defendants.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No.16-cv-01491-HRL

12

On September 19, 2016, the Court issued an order instructing the parties to complete a

13

joint inspection by October 7, 2016. The order stated: “[i]f the parties fail to comply with this

14

order, the court may issue an order to show cause why the defendants’ answer should not be

15

stricken.” Dkt. No. 23.

16

The plaintiff has informed the court that he has attempted to schedule a joint site inspection

17

but has received no response from the defendants. As a result, the court hereby orders the

18

defendants to show cause, if any, why their answer should not be stricken for failure to comply

19

with General Order 56. The parties shall appear at a show cause hearing on November 22, 2016,

20

at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California. The

21

defendants shall file a statement in response to this order to show cause no later than November

22

15, 2016.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 10/13/2016

25
26
27
28

HOWARD R. LLOYD
United States Magistrate Judge