Animal Protection and Rescue League, Inc. v. Northridge Owner, L.P. et al

Filing 36

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/30/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 5 ANIMAL PROTECTION AND RESCUE LEAGUE, INC., Plaintiff, 6 7 8 9 Case No. 16-cv-01494-BLF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. NORTHRIDGE OWNER, L.P., et al., Defendants. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Plaintiff Animal Protection and Rescue League, Inc. (“APRL”) is hereby ORDERED TO 12 SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice for violation of this Court’s 13 Order Dismissing Case for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction with Leave to Amend. ECF 35. 14 The Order required APRL to file an amended complaint by September 23, 2016. Id. at 6. Plaintiff 15 did not amend its complaint within the time provided and still has not amended it. 16 Failure to amend a complaint is considered a failure to comply with a Court order and is 17 grounds for dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 18 See Yourish v. Calif. Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 1999). 19 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be 20 dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order or to file a notice of intent not to 21 file an amended complaint on or before October 28, 2016. If APRL files an amended complaint 22 on or before that date, the Court will dissolve the order to show cause. However, if APRL does 23 not respond, the Court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 24 Procedure 41(b) without further notice. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: September 30, 2016 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?