SlashSupport, Inc. v. Choodamani

Filing 32

ORDER GRANTING 31 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 8/11/2016 09:00 AM. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/20/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2016)

Download PDF
1 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP KURT A. FRANKLIN, SBN 172715 2 kfranklin@hansonbridgett.com 425 Market Street, 26th Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 4 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff SlashSupport, Inc. d/b/a/ CSS Corp 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 SLASHSUPPORT, INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a CSS Corp, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 NATARAJAN CHOODAMANI, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 CASE NO. 5:16-cv-01505-BLF NOTICE OF CONTINUED RESOLUTION DISCUSSION AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER This is to notify the Court that the parties have made recent progress on informally 20 resolving their differences related to Plaintiff SlashSupport, Inc.'s request for a permanent 21 injunction and are now working on documentation related to a resolution. Moreover, the parties 22 wish to focus their efforts on resolution rather than near-term briefing on the pending motions. 23 Accordingly, to avoid the cost of potentially unnecessary briefing, the parties stipulate to the 24 following: 25 (1) The hearing on Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Injunction is moved to 9:00 a.m. 26 27 12394989.1 on Thursday, August 11, 2016, to coincide with the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. 28 5:16-cv-01505-BLF NOT. OF CONT. RESOLUTION DISCUSSION AND STIP. TO CONTINUE BRIEFING ON PLTF'S MOT. FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFT'S MOT. TO DISMISS AND TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE ON PLTF'S MOT. FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 (2) If briefing remains necessary, the deadline for Plaintiff to file an opposition to 2 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is moved 3 from Monday, May 23, 2016, to Monday, June 13, 2016. 4 (3) If briefing remains necessary, the deadline for Defendant to file an opposition to 5 Plaintiff's Request for a Preliminary Injunction is moved from Wednesday May 25, 6 2016, to Wednesday, June 15, 2016. 7 8 9 (4) Reply briefs to both above-referenced motions, if any, shall be due with 7 days of the oppositions. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 DATED: May 20, 2016 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 11 12 By: 13 14 /s/ Kurt A. Franklin KURT A. FRANKLIN Attorneys for Plaintiff SlashSupport, Inc. d/b/a/ CSS Corp 15 16 DATED: May 20, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID W. ANDERSON 17 18 By: 19 20 21 /s/ David W. Anderson DAVID W. ANDERSON Attorney for Defendant Natarajan Choodamani PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 DATED: May 20, 2016 24 25 26 THE HONORABLE BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 27 12394989.1 28 5:16-cv-01505-BLF -2NOT. OF CONT. RESOLUTION DISCUSSION AND STIP. TO CONTINUE BRIEFING ON PLTF'S MOT. FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFT'S MOT. TO DISMISS AND TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE ON PLTF'S MOT. FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?