Ruben Garcia et al v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 6

ORDER re: 2 Plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Restraining Order. 1.Plaintiffs shall immediately, and no later than 12:00 p.m. on 4/7/2016, serve Defendants with copies of the Complaint, Summons, TRO application, this order, and any oth er documents filed on the district court docket, and shall file a certificate of service demonstrating that such service has been completed. 2.All parties shall thereafter appear before the undersigned at 10:00 a.m. on 4/8/2016 for a Status Conferenc e to discuss scheduling matters related to Plaintiffs TRO application. The parties are advised that such conference will not be a hearing on the merits of the application. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/6/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

SAN JOSE DIVISION

7
8

RUBEN GARCIA, et al.,

Case No. 5:16-cv-01725-EJD

Plaintiffs,
9

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’
APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER

v.
10
11

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 2

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13

Because Plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) does not include

14

a declaration or other document that complies with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil

15

Procedure 65(b)(1) for the issuance of injunctive relief without notice, the court orders as follows:

16

1.

Plaintiffs shall immediately, and no later than 12:00 p.m. on April 7, 2016, serve

17

Defendants with copies of the Complaint, Summons, TRO application, this order, and any other

18

documents filed on the district court docket, and shall file a certificate of service demonstrating

19

that such service has been completed.

20

2.

All parties shall thereafter appear before the undersigned at 10:00 a.m. on April 8,

21

2016, for a Status Conference to discuss scheduling matters related to Plaintiffs’ TRO application.

22

The parties are advised that such conference will not be a hearing on the merits of the application.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 6, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
1
Case No.: 5:16-cv-01725-EJD
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER